G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
I'm looking at low-cost USB and Firewire audio/midi boxes with the potential for low latency performance (not just direct hardware input monitoring) via midi in.
So far, the most promising is the Tascam US-122 and the M-Audio Firewire Audiophile.
However, I notice the Tascam only has a minimum buffer size of 256 samples which gives about 12 seconds of latency with Cubase.
The M-Audio has a default of 256 samples, but this can be reduced (to 64?) if one's hardware/software system can cope.
Should I be able to get lower midi latency with the M-Audio box? (although I think the Tascam has kernel-level midi drivers for low latency)
I would be running a software rompler such as Gigastudio 3 Solo or NI Kompakt.
I'm looking at low-cost USB and Firewire audio/midi boxes with the potential for low latency performance (not just direct hardware input monitoring) via midi in.
So far, the most promising is the Tascam US-122 and the M-Audio Firewire Audiophile.
However, I notice the Tascam only has a minimum buffer size of 256 samples which gives about 12 seconds of latency with Cubase.
The M-Audio has a default of 256 samples, but this can be reduced (to 64?) if one's hardware/software system can cope.
Should I be able to get lower midi latency with the M-Audio box? (although I think the Tascam has kernel-level midi drivers for low latency)
I would be running a software rompler such as Gigastudio 3 Solo or NI Kompakt.