Archived from groups: alt.video.laserdisc (
More info?)
darrel.christensen@comcast.net says...
> jayembee wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I've never understood the appeal of "still sealed" LDs.
>> I realize the idea is supposed to be that if they are still
>> sealed, they must be in mint condition, but that's not necessarily
>> the case.
>
> I think, though I may be wrong, that some of what
> we call "rot" is from moisture getting in between
> the layers of a poorly made disc so I would think
> that a sealed disc would have been less subject to
> such an effect than one open to the environment...
Not moisture, but air. But that's beside the point.
(1) A lot of rot cases were immediate conditions, not just over time. I
had a very low incidence of rot in my collection, but I'd say that of
the cases I had, about 50% of the time, they were from new, sealed
discs.
(2) Given how long LDs have been out of production, any discs that are
still sealed are still pretty old, and have as much chance of being
rotten as unsealed discs, because...
(3) LD shrink-wrapping isn't always airtight. Far more often than not, I
would be able to get the shrink-wrap off because they was a hole in the
wrap somewhere that I could use to start the tear.
> ... but I agree with the orignial poster, I bought
> a sealed disc just this past week and it had a wee
> bit of sparkle at the start of side 1 BUT I got the
> last boxed set in the Twin Peaks series sealed with
> the Tower Records price tage still on it and all 4
> discs were perfect.
No doubt. I've gotten a lot of still-sealed discs, either through eBay,
or through blow-out sales at places like Sight & Sound and Laser
Exchange, and they've generally been perfect. But I've also gotten any
number of opened, used discs from the same sources, and they haven't
been any worse.
The only real advantage I see in getting still-sealed LDs is that the
jackets are typically in better condition.
-- jayembee