Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (
More info?)
"Edward Bridge" <edbridge@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8HJUc.25573$nx2.21403@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
> news:FeWdne9DDp1Uor7cRVn-vw@comcast.com...
>> "Ercole/painstorm.com" <ercole@painstorm.com> wrote in message
>> news:AhFUc.10665$B06.7272@news.edisontel.com
>>> Hello,
>>> I want buy 3 CAD mics, any of you have listened the CAD CXL 2200 or
>>> CAD CXL 2200?
>>> Those are good michropones?
>>
>> While I'm a happy owner of 8 CAD mics, I bought the first one and
>> checked it out before diving in any further.
>
>
> Oh yea which ones ?
FWIW, CAD 95s.
> Which ones do you like for acoustic /nylon guitar?
MXL 603 s
> I have two e 100's that I thought was a mistake until I try others
> mic's lately, I have_ faith _ in them now. Also I have them sitting
> out for 5 years recording my students and they held up with a many
> .many short drops. I guess mic sitting out is not a do thing minus
> the drops?
IME a mic that is appropriate for live performance use is not a fragile
thing. When you drop stuff it matters how far you drop it and on what.
OT, and perhaps old news. OTOH, you might find comparison of the two
following web pages to be amusing:
http/www.cadmics.com/contact.htm
"Testing, one, two three, testing" ;-)
http/www.astatic.com/commercial/contact_body.htm
"Breaker 1-9?" ;-)
Note that the customer service numbers are the same plus/minus the extension
number.
Note that one manufacturing facility is at 341 Harbor St. and the other is
at is at 341 Harbor Street. Is the St. shorter than the Street? ;-)