Cingular EDGE...

[chip]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:6P6Qc.5624$54.91222@typhoon.sonic.net...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <7rtie0ticq8smkud8cpck4lgj3jq22fb17@4ax.com> on Mon, 05 Jul 2004
15:41:24
> GMT, Jimmy <NoOneYet@Nowhere.Net> wrote:
>
> >On 4 Jul 2004 10:08:18 -0700, ashkon@gmail.com (Ashkon) wrote:
> >
> >>"Chip" <chip@invalid.com> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> If you are using the EDGE connection to connect your laptop, try
increasing
> >>> the Windows RWIN (TCP Receive Window Size) global registry setting for
dial
> >>> up networking to 53248 (this value is being tossed around internally
at CW).
> >>> Increasing RWIN will overcome some latency issues and throughput will
likely
> >>> increase as well.
>
> 53248 is an appropriate value for that kind of latency with 500 Kbps
speed,
> and is thus excessive for much slower EDGE, although probably not harmful.
> The standard RWIN of 16K bytes in Windows Me/2000/XP is actually
sufficient.
> Increased RWIN is really only needed for Windows 95/98/NT, which are 8K
bytes
> by default.


I won't argue that. However, the following may be of interest to current
Cingular EDGE - Sony Ericsson GC82 users:

As I understand it, the Data Connect product and drivers, previously offered
with the Sony-Ericsson GC82 EDGE PC card were apparently not tuned for
optimal throughput. Cingular has released a version of CCM (Cingular
Connection Manager) that includes optimized settings and drivers for the
GC82. It is available as a free download at Cingular's website. See the link
at:
http/www.cingular.com/business/connection_manager

Current GC82 - Data Connect users should also read and follow the guidance
at the following link:

http/www.cingular.com/download/Data_Connect_Uninstall_Instructions_8_16_04_V2.pdf

I honestly don't know what treatment (if any) was applied to RWIN settings
in the CCM update.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular.data,alt.cellular.attws (More info?)

just a test

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> ???????/???????? ? ????????
?????????: news:3U6Qc.5626$54.90931@typhoon.sonic.net...
> In <7rtie0ticq8smkud8cpck4lgj3jq22fb17@4ax.com> on Mon, 05 Jul 2004
15:41:24
> GMT, Jimmy <NoOneYet@Nowhere.Net> wrote:
>
> >On 4 Jul 2004 10:08:18 -0700, ashkon@gmail.com (Ashkon) wrote:
> >
> >>"Chip" <chip@invalid.com> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> If you are using the EDGE connection to connect your laptop, try
increasing
> >>> the Windows RWIN (TCP Receive Window Size) global registry setting for
dial
> >>> up networking to 53248 (this value is being tossed around internally
at CW).
> >>> Increasing RWIN will overcome some latency issues and throughput will
likely
> >>> increase as well.
>
> 53248 (which is actually based on a broadband Urban Myth) is only needed
for
> that kind of latency with 500 Kbps speed, and is thus excessive for much
> slower EDGE, although probably not harmful. The standard RWIN of 16384
bytes
> in Windows Me/2000/XP is actually sufficient for EDGE -- increased RWIN is
> really only needed for Windows 95/98/NT, which are 8192 bytes by default.
For
> UMTS (now deployed in 4 cities by ATTWS), the appropriate value is 32768
> bytes, needed in all versions of Windows.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular.data,alt.cellular.attws (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <65614$4112e812$40694c09$12681@msgid.meganewsservers.com> on Fri, 6 Aug
2004 06:07:57 +0400, "Ashot Shahbazian" <tyrebusters(at)covad(dot)net> wrote:

>just a test

Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test newsgroup.
Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.

In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup, test
newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for. Thanks for
your consideration.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.gsm,alt.cellular.data,alt.cellular.attws (More info?)

On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 05:23:03 GMT, John Navas
<spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <65614$4112e812$40694c09$12681@msgid.meganewsservers.com> on Fri, 6 Aug
>2004 06:07:57 +0400, "Ashot Shahbazian" <tyrebusters(at)covad(dot)net> wrote:
>
>>just a test
>
>Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test newsgroup.
>Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.
>
>In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
>microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup, test
>newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for. Thanks for
>your consideration.