This is highly suspect. I would tend to believe there was trace amounts of cocaine on their equipment which made them think it was on the bills.
eg: If I'm wearing purple sunglasses the world is 95% purple.
I am surprised that it is that low. Of course, I could care less whether or not money has drug residue or not; it is not like I am going to attempt extraction of the drug from the bills.
MrBradley: Could you? Yes, but it is extremely difficult to do. I would not attempt to hang my hat on that defense if you get caught with a straw up your nose.
[citation][nom]tsiberious[/nom]This is highly suspect. I would tend to believe there was trace amounts of cocaine on their equipment which made them think it was on the bills.eg: If I'm wearing purple sunglasses the world is 95% purple.[/citation]
Uh, yeah. These people are stupid enough to forget to clean their equipment. Chances are the bills received an application of a certain chemical to show the presence of certain drugs.
Man, the some of the comments on here are f-in hilarious!! Whoever smashed George's head on Al Pacino did a good job! Man, I posted it on my facebook... awesomeness. Oh yea, about the topic? Who gives a shit.
This is news why? Who cares? Besides, why not put Obama's picture here? Unlike Bill Clinton, at least Obama admitted to inhaling a narcotic. Must be a slow news day.
The Bush and Cocaine picture is just downright funny. Oh Yea homerhellboy223 - You must've not read the entire article. Here, let me quote [citation][nom]ABOVE ARTICLE[/nom]According to the findings presented today at the biannual meeting of the American Chemical Society, Washington D.C. (unsurprisingly) ranked the highest on the survey with a 95-percent contamination (those darn politicians).[/citation]
234 bills? with the billions in circulation, 234 bills is a good sample set- 13 bills per city? were they ones, tens, twenties, hundreds? Were all the bill collected at the same sample point, thus contacting one another and polluting the samples?