[citation][nom]cyprod[/nom]molo9000, you see this is exactly what you don't understand. You are correct that 99% of users don't care about openness. But a lack of openness restricts them from doing what they want. And this they do care about. This is extremely common in tech. 99% of the people don't care about FFTs, but they sure do care about being able to watch HD content from a single disc.It's becoming increasingly common that I show a non-tech savvy friend something I've done on my droid, they think it's cool and ask me if I can do it on their iphone, and I have to explain to them that it's impossible because apple won't let me do it. This restricts the "apps, apps and more apps", thus potential customers do care about openness, even if not directly.[/citation]
@cyprod: You don't seem to understand the typical consumer. For the typical American consumer there are more apps out there then they would ever want or use in a lifetime. Why do you need 50 different versions of the same thing, especially if 4-5 decent versions are already available? The consumer has no idea of what openness is, nor do they care, nor will it have any impact on them and their choice of apps.
Having access to numerous apps brings to mind the typical teenage software pirate. They brag how they have over 50 apps for doing everything under the sun. Ask them how many they use everyday and you will get a response like "two or three." The first thing is that you have to learn the app, and then apply it. Add to the fact that you can only do so much in one day, then what is the point of owning or having access to hundreds of apps? There is none.
HP and Dell can bash Apple all they want, but they would be well served to spend their energies creating innovation. To give American's some credit here, I think the people of this country are growing weary of the continual bashing and criticizing of anything and everything.