FCC Filings Point Toward PS3 Slim Refreshes

[Gin Fushicho]

Come on, we need wireless N , this Wireless G is bull crap , I cna't even get half of my 20Mbps with Wireless G , it does not get a good enough signal.

 

[Snuffles]

[citation][nom]festerovic[/nom]for those that need N get a wireless N bridge, and connect it to the Ethernet. And FYI, G is = 54mbs, with quality components it goes 100ft indoors. Really.[/citation]

Or get a really long cable.

 

[matthroswell]

[citation][nom]grieve[/nom]And 8 Gigs of Ram!I would love a Ferrari as well, add that to the wish list.[/citation]

Let me know how your foot tastes tastes when Sony releases a PS3 model with a factory installed SSD.

Ferrari acquisition is not a realistic comparison.

 

[TeKEffect]

I'm old school. Still using ethernet cable and suggest more people use it.

 

[anonymousdude]

I love my 50ft ethernet cable. Wireless N would be a welcome addition, but not enough people have the connection speeds to utilize it, so G is sufficient. N would benefit people with their PS3 a couple rooms away, but I'm willing to bet people have their PS3 close enough to their router that it wouldn't matter too much.

 

[Guest]

The update is for 3D HDMI 1.4

 

[kenwheeler77]

[citation][nom]warmon6[/nom]why do we need wireless N for game consoles? If the console is just connected to the network for internet, G is more than fine as the most ISP's don't offer 25(+) Mbps speeds. heck the majority of us dont even have 10mbps.[/citation]

Some of us actually use the PS3 as more than a gaming console. In fact, I purchased mine for streaming media and Blu-ray playback. I don't have to purchase another Blu-ray player for the new and upcoming 3D either. If you want to stream full HD content, wireless G just doesn't cut it. wireless N would allow people to actually use all of the features that a PS3 has without tethering it to your network.

Now, if they'd only get rid of the FAT32 limitation and install some additional codecs....