future of satellite programming?

Johnny

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2001
133
0
18,630
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that mean
that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

==
If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units
==

Who told you this. Maybe I do not understand what you mean by "service".

DCII is not going away. Why would it? It is there for the uplinkers. It is not there
for us.



<johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
news:BpnGc.6578$oD3.1046@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
| develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that mean
| that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
|
|
|
|
 

Johnny

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2001
133
0
18,630
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

Huh? If it's for the uplinkers and not for us, then why are the units being
sold to the general public?

What I meant by service is repair.

DRLev wrote:

> ==
> If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units
> ==
>
> Who told you this. Maybe I do not understand what you mean by "service".
>
> DCII is not going away. Why would it? It is there for the uplinkers. It is
> not there for us.
>
>
>
> <johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
> news:BpnGc.6578$oD3.1046@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> | If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
> | develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that
> | mean that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
> |
> |
> |
> |
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

Are you actually naive enough to believe that those signals
are intended for people with dishes in their yards? The only
signals that are uplinked for home consumers are the small
channels. The others are for commercial end users such as
cable companies and the networks. The small dish companies
also grab these and rebroadcast them.

If all of the consumer big dishes were to fall off the face of
the earth tonight there would be no significant change in
what is being sent to those satellites. Even at its peak the
BUD was not the intended audience for the largest amount
of what is being uplinked. There were a few channels and
programs were intended for BUD owners, most of them selling
subscription programming or equipment to us. But we are
and always have been fleas riding on the back of a large dog.

<johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
news:gTnHc.9656$R36.2926@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Huh? If it's for the uplinkers and not for us, then why are the units being
| sold to the general public?
|
| What I meant by service is repair.
|
| DRLev wrote:
|
| > ==
| > If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units
| > ==
| >
| > Who told you this. Maybe I do not understand what you mean by "service".
| >
| > DCII is not going away. Why would it? It is there for the uplinkers. It is
| > not there for us.
| >
| >
| >
| > <johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
| > news:BpnGc.6578$oD3.1046@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| > | If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
| > | develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that
| > | mean that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
|
|
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

Sorry

I made a typo

"The only signals that are uplinked for home consumers are the small
channels."

Should say

"The only signals that are uplinked for home consumers are the small
dish channels."



<johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
news:gTnHc.9656$R36.2926@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Huh? If it's for the uplinkers and not for us, then why are the units being
| sold to the general public?
|
| What I meant by service is repair.
|
| DRLev wrote:
|
| > ==
| > If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units
| > ==
| >
| > Who told you this. Maybe I do not understand what you mean by "service".
| >
| > DCII is not going away. Why would it? It is there for the uplinkers. It is
| > not there for us.
| >
| >
| >
| > <johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
| > news:BpnGc.6578$oD3.1046@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| > | If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
| > | develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that
| > | mean that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
|
|
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:00:28 GMT, johnny@n0sq.net wrote:

>Huh? If it's for the uplinkers and not for us, then why are the units being
>sold to the general public?
>

For ancillary home reception of feeds that are there anyway for
commercial distribution to cable headends and other purposes.

>What I meant by service is repair.
>
I understood that.

What you may be failing to grasp is C-band is primarily for commercial
distribution, and the majority of the feeds, and the technology used
to uplink them, will not disappear because the last 4DTV is
decommissioned.

>DRLev wrote:
>
>> ==
>> If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units
>> ==
>>
>> Who told you this. Maybe I do not understand what you mean by "service".
>>
>> DCII is not going away. Why would it? It is there for the uplinkers. It is
>> not there for us.
>>
>>
>>
>> <johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
>> news:BpnGc.6578$oD3.1046@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> | If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
>> | develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that
>> | mean that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.4dtv (More info?)

Are you saying that GI/Mot is no longer repairing
4DTV's ? I do not know your source for this info,
but I think the source is questionable at the very
least. Sounds like another unsubstantiated rumor.





<johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
news:gTnHc.9656$R36.2926@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Huh? If it's for the uplinkers and not for us, then why are the units being
| sold to the general public?
|
| What I meant by service is repair.
|
| DRLev wrote:
|
| > ==
| > If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units
| > ==
| >
| > Who told you this. Maybe I do not understand what you mean by "service".
| >
| > DCII is not going away. Why would it? It is there for the uplinkers. It is
| > not there for us.
| >
| >
| >
| > <johnny@n0sq.net> wrote in message
| > news:BpnGc.6578$oD3.1046@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| > | If Motorola doesn't plan to service existing units and doesn't plan to
| > | develop a follow-on receiver to replace the 922, what then? Does that
| > | mean that GI's proprietary MPEG-2 format is going away?
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
|
|