Looks like Google is moving from a subscription-based plan to cloud-storage like mSpot
Google May Nuke Plan for Subscription Music : Read more
Google May Nuke Plan for Subscription Music : Read more
If I purchase the rights to play a song to myself, why can't I store it on a cloud service where I can access it from anywhere? I don't understand why Google needs the record labels' buy-in, but it bothers me to think that EMI, Sony, WB, or Universal will get a nickel every time I stream a song to my phone that I already paid them for.Google also reportedly hired on music technology lawyer Elizabeth Moody back in July to take the reigns of the project. Moody is supposedly in close negotiations with the four big record labels, however Google as a company has not started official negotiations with the actual music publishers-- they hold a different set of rights.
boy they really need to get rid of those ex-apple employees. it's getting to be like the white house/congress over there.An unnamed source close to Google's music plans claim
play on words or a hint about tomS pot and all that doobie rollin' and smokin' going on.methinks it would explain alot!similar tomSpot.