G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.satellite,alt.satellite.expressvu,alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,sci.engr.television.advanced (More info?)
yea right <spam@spam.spam> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.09.17.02.53.12.799211@spam.spam>...
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:50:14 +0200, Jason Sperry wrote:
>
> > Heck even 720p looks better for high
> > speed images because you get a full 720 lines in 1/60th of a second, with
> > 1080i you only get 540 lines in 1/60th of a second.
>
> Nope, you get the top half of a 720P picture in 1/60th of a second.
>
> 720P is only 30 frames per second.
> 1080i is 60 fields per second to make up 30 frames per second.
Get a clue, 720 does not have to be 30 fps. Several US broadcasters
currently broadcast 720p/60 content, that's 60 whole frames per
second. Sport events, where most of the time you have fast motion look
better in 720p@60fps than 1080i.
yea right <spam@spam.spam> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.09.17.02.53.12.799211@spam.spam>...
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:50:14 +0200, Jason Sperry wrote:
>
> > Heck even 720p looks better for high
> > speed images because you get a full 720 lines in 1/60th of a second, with
> > 1080i you only get 540 lines in 1/60th of a second.
>
> Nope, you get the top half of a 720P picture in 1/60th of a second.
>
> 720P is only 30 frames per second.
> 1080i is 60 fields per second to make up 30 frames per second.
Get a clue, 720 does not have to be 30 fps. Several US broadcasters
currently broadcast 720p/60 content, that's 60 whole frames per
second. Sport events, where most of the time you have fast motion look
better in 720p@60fps than 1080i.