I'm in the market for a new laptop preferably with a 17" screen (since my old HP Compaq 6820s has just died).
I want something reliable that will last a long time. I'm planning on using it primarily watch movies, (occasional downloading NZBs in the background simultaneously - no correlation between the two ). In the future I'll probably want to output to TV when I finally get around to updating that too. Other than that it'll just be used for web-browsing and MS Office. I don't plan on gaming.
I'm thinking of either a HP Pavilion 17-e153sa for £550 or a Dell Inspiron 17R 5737 for £500.
I'm a bit (a lot!) out of touch with PC hardware, so from what I can see the differences between the two are: The HP has integrated Intel HD 4600 graphics whereas the Dell has a dedicated AMD Radeon™ HD 8870M 2GB GDDR5. However the HP comes with an Intel® Core™ i5-4200M which I believe to be better (faster) than the Dells Intel® Core™ i5-4200U (albeit at the cost of being less efficient). The Dell has 4 USB ports vs the HPs 3 ports, and the HP has a VGA port that the dell doesn't. Have I missed anything significant?
My gut tells me to pay the extra £50 to go for the HP. From experience HP has always been more reliable than Dell (is that still the general opinion), so may be the one to go for for longevity (especially having the faster processor). I'm just slightly aware of the integrated graphics (as in times gone by that was always a big no-no). Any thoughts from the experts?
I want something reliable that will last a long time. I'm planning on using it primarily watch movies, (occasional downloading NZBs in the background simultaneously - no correlation between the two ). In the future I'll probably want to output to TV when I finally get around to updating that too. Other than that it'll just be used for web-browsing and MS Office. I don't plan on gaming.
I'm thinking of either a HP Pavilion 17-e153sa for £550 or a Dell Inspiron 17R 5737 for £500.
I'm a bit (a lot!) out of touch with PC hardware, so from what I can see the differences between the two are: The HP has integrated Intel HD 4600 graphics whereas the Dell has a dedicated AMD Radeon™ HD 8870M 2GB GDDR5. However the HP comes with an Intel® Core™ i5-4200M which I believe to be better (faster) than the Dells Intel® Core™ i5-4200U (albeit at the cost of being less efficient). The Dell has 4 USB ports vs the HPs 3 ports, and the HP has a VGA port that the dell doesn't. Have I missed anything significant?
My gut tells me to pay the extra £50 to go for the HP. From experience HP has always been more reliable than Dell (is that still the general opinion), so may be the one to go for for longevity (especially having the faster processor). I'm just slightly aware of the integrated graphics (as in times gone by that was always a big no-no). Any thoughts from the experts?