All I'm seeing is: "Reputable tech blog writer forgets that A-to-C fast charging cables exist and forgot to plan for it."
Well, I don’t know about the reputable part based on their bio maybe change that to disreputable?All I'm seeing is: "Reputable tech blog writer forgets that A-to-C fast charging cables exist and forgot to plan for it."
Maybe the author isn't as dumb as he appears. Maybe he doesn't believe a word of what he wrote and truly did it for click bait and to get people to sign up and comment.
Yeah, I should've worded that better. Reputable site publishes ragebait tech article written by unvetted rookie? lol. I signed up because of this one.Well, I don’t know about the reputable part based on their bio maybe change that to disreputable?
Love itIt's what I did along with a bunch of us here in the comments, yeah. Fair point.
Yeah, I should've worded that better. Reputable site publishes ragebait tech article written by unvetted rookie? lol. I signed up because of this one.
Yeah, I’m not sure why Apple never tried lighting ports as a money grabbing scheme maybe they figured that it would annoy people too much or just wouldn’t be popular enough to mess with.They need to either lower the quota, or need to find people who actually know about he tech they're writing about.
USB A-to-C 3.X as well as those "charge cables" that are perplexingly wired to deliver 3.2x2 PD while only capable of USB 2.0 speeds (probably a cost thing) have been gobbled up by techie and layman alike for years now.
And lightning cables aren't exactly mating to "lightning ports in the wall."
The only folk who will have any sort of trouble are those who have genuinley been under a rock for the past 2 decades.
This!I'm really confused about this article.
Almost all the phones that have usb-c, came with a usb-a, usb-c cable.. I don't even think that it's called adapter.
Almost all devices use usb-c now days: Nintendo switch, playstation 5, modern PCs, tablets (even ipad) uses usb-c and are most likely to come with one usb-c/usb-a cable.. I really didn't get what all that surprise came from
And that said, he goes from dumb to a loser for resorting to that low brow tactic. Maybe they'd have more traffic if they wrote better quality articles in the first place.It's what I did along with a bunch of us here in the comments, yeah. Fair point.
I don't normally comment on anything, but I registered specifically to say this is the single-most moronic article I've ever read on "tech". It beggars belief that the "editor" could even get a job writing about technology given both the fundamental inaccuracies contained within, combined with their general ineptitude. I will be removing TG from future news aggregation.