yeah but like pentium d's ate a lot of power too, if not twice as much i believe. plus they were stacked in the same cpu. why not just just make dual xeon laptop, again, i think it's because of the problem of market share. who's actually gonna know that it's worth it, plus, xeon is a whole new platform for laptops so i wouldn't expect them to shell out a pretty paycheck for it. i think it's a market scheme they didn't want to touch, which is why i haven't been buying anything new since my first new cpu nowadays. i just don't agree with them and i don't see a puddle of plastic. cause the pentium d already proved this is not accurate. i mean think about it. how would they implement a xeon workstation to people, how many would jump on a new idea except people like me that love power and know about dual cpu systems. not many, if you were trying to imply that, then i'd understand and just feel bummed out. other then that, that's just my two cents, i think they should make it.