[citation][nom]wiyosaya[/nom]Cameron's assessment is divergent from what is happening at movie theaters. Many movie goers are opting for 2D screenings of 3D films. To me, this indicates that people do not see the value in 3D, and would rather pay less for the same film in 2D since 3D adds little to the film. About the only thing that 3D does is drain money from movie goer pockets and infuse that money into the pockets of theaters and movie makers.I find it interesting that people like Cameron and other people who earn a lot of money are consulted like they are experts. Cameron makes good films, but in my opinion, he should stick to film making. His area of expertise is narrow just like that of most other people who have made a ton of money from pursuits that are very narrow. As such, those people are only experts at what they made money at, e.g., Cameron and film making, and not at the broader areas that the media "consults" them on.Personally, I thought the 3D for Avatar was purely bling and added nothing to the film. I am not saying it was not a great film; it was, however, a great story for which 3D does little.[/citation]
totally agree with youa botu 3d tech , totally diagree with youa botu jame's movie making abilities and how good avatar was , 1 ajmes didn't write that story he jsut yanked off better and older version of the story (pocahontas). 2. msot every movie he has done since The Abyss has sucked and lacked utterly and completely in any creativity or originallity IMO. i though avatar was an Ok movie , but cerainly not desreving of all the money movie goers dumped on it