Hi,
I own an Asus UL30VT
Great laptop but over 3 years old.
It's intended purpose (mobile gaming) has been rendered useless by new games.
This might sound like a dream but, here's what I'm looking for in a laptop:
Powerful
+ Nothing less than Ivy Bridge i7
+Decent graphics (should be able to play top-caliber games for the next few years. Not really into FPS, so can exclude Crysis and BF3)
Portability
+ approx =< the weight of my current laptop (2 kg, 4.2 lbs)
+ approx =< the thickness (25mm, 1")
+ Not too big 15.6" absolute maximum
Superior build quality (obviously)
+ Don't like anything too plasticky that feels cheap like the Acer M and V series
Decent Battery Life
+ Switchable graphics were incredibly handy on my current laptop
+ 5 hours minimum (> if equipped with switchable graphics)
Long-Lasting
+ I'm willing to fork over the extra $$$ if I can get it to last at least another 3 years
Will also want to probably use it connected to an external monitor at home
I live in Australia which means stuff is like 4/3 the price as compared to the US
but I'll be going on holiday to different countries (including the US at the end of the year)
Here's a few laptops I've found:
Retina Macbook Pro
+ 15.6"
+ Decent graphics (overclocked 1 GB nVidia G650M)
+ Relatively light
+ Awesome build quality
+ Aesthetically pleasing
+ Decent Battery Life
- I'm not a fan of OSX
> I don't think I'll be able to survive simply running OSX but the way people talk about it on the net, it seems running windows on it is no problem and only decreases battery life (more info please).
Could I use the MBP just running windows to its full potential and play the games I want?
- Expensive (like WTH!) for the price i get the MBP for I could get a decent desktop gaming PC and an ultrabook. Is this a better alternative?
Sony Vaio S 15.6"
Pretty much very similar to the MBP but has a lower GPU (nVidia G640M LE 2GB)
This raises the question: Is 2GB of a lower graphics card > 1 GB of a more powerful graphics card?
In this case: is 2 GB G640M LE > 1 GB overclocked G650M
The next two aren't out yet. But based on speculation:
Asus U500VZ (15.6") - 2 GB nVidia G645M
Again, similar to MBP except
- low battery life (on preview model)
- relatively big and heavy
Asus UX42VS (14") - 1 GB nVidia G645M
+ Better battery life (in ultrabook region)
+ More portable
+ Lighter
If there are better stuff coming out (confirmed) I would be willing to wait.
If you could answer the questions it would really help me in my own research in finding a laptop:
+ Is 2GB of a lower graphics card > 1 GB of a more powerful graphics card?
+Could I use the MBP just running windows to its full potential and play the games I want?
I use the gadget on notebook check which ranks the GPUs but I'm not sure how accurate it is in terms of different VRAMs and different CPU speeds.
Thx in advance
Your help is greatly appreciated!
Looking forward to your swift reply
I own an Asus UL30VT
Great laptop but over 3 years old.
It's intended purpose (mobile gaming) has been rendered useless by new games.
This might sound like a dream but, here's what I'm looking for in a laptop:
Powerful
+ Nothing less than Ivy Bridge i7
+Decent graphics (should be able to play top-caliber games for the next few years. Not really into FPS, so can exclude Crysis and BF3)
Portability
+ approx =< the weight of my current laptop (2 kg, 4.2 lbs)
+ approx =< the thickness (25mm, 1")
+ Not too big 15.6" absolute maximum
Superior build quality (obviously)
+ Don't like anything too plasticky that feels cheap like the Acer M and V series
Decent Battery Life
+ Switchable graphics were incredibly handy on my current laptop
+ 5 hours minimum (> if equipped with switchable graphics)
Long-Lasting
+ I'm willing to fork over the extra $$$ if I can get it to last at least another 3 years
Will also want to probably use it connected to an external monitor at home
I live in Australia which means stuff is like 4/3 the price as compared to the US
but I'll be going on holiday to different countries (including the US at the end of the year)
Here's a few laptops I've found:
Retina Macbook Pro
+ 15.6"
+ Decent graphics (overclocked 1 GB nVidia G650M)
+ Relatively light
+ Awesome build quality
+ Aesthetically pleasing
+ Decent Battery Life
- I'm not a fan of OSX
> I don't think I'll be able to survive simply running OSX but the way people talk about it on the net, it seems running windows on it is no problem and only decreases battery life (more info please).
Could I use the MBP just running windows to its full potential and play the games I want?
- Expensive (like WTH!) for the price i get the MBP for I could get a decent desktop gaming PC and an ultrabook. Is this a better alternative?
Sony Vaio S 15.6"
Pretty much very similar to the MBP but has a lower GPU (nVidia G640M LE 2GB)
This raises the question: Is 2GB of a lower graphics card > 1 GB of a more powerful graphics card?
In this case: is 2 GB G640M LE > 1 GB overclocked G650M
The next two aren't out yet. But based on speculation:
Asus U500VZ (15.6") - 2 GB nVidia G645M
Again, similar to MBP except
- low battery life (on preview model)
- relatively big and heavy
Asus UX42VS (14") - 1 GB nVidia G645M
+ Better battery life (in ultrabook region)
+ More portable
+ Lighter
If there are better stuff coming out (confirmed) I would be willing to wait.
If you could answer the questions it would really help me in my own research in finding a laptop:
+ Is 2GB of a lower graphics card > 1 GB of a more powerful graphics card?
+Could I use the MBP just running windows to its full potential and play the games I want?
I use the gadget on notebook check which ranks the GPUs but I'm not sure how accurate it is in terms of different VRAMs and different CPU speeds.
Thx in advance
Your help is greatly appreciated!
Looking forward to your swift reply