I just heard an interesting news and thought I’d share it. So there’s been a heated debate over the matter of active 3D tv versus passive 3D tv. While active 3D TVs (Samsung and Panasonic are two biggest ones I think..) give 3D images in awesome quality, flickers and crosstalks and expensive 3D glasses were the biggest cons. Passive 3D TV (biggest one is LG Cinema 3D) uses lightweight, battery free 3D glasses just like those from the movie theater, thus reducing the flickers and crosstalks. Some people say that passive 3D TVs sacrifice the image quality for its comfort. I guess that just depends on people because when I saw the same demo on both active and passive TVs, I didn’t see much difference in the image quality. In fact, I liked LG Cinema 3D better because it showed the colors more vividly…You can tell how vivid the color is when you look at black. LG Cinema 3D seemed to have deeper black than any other active 3D TVs. Well, in theory, active 3D tvs ARE supposed to have better image quality and some people point that out (I didn’t notice it though). Interestingly, LG just stepped up its game by updating firmware and software on its Cinema 3D series to improve the image quality and resolution. I haven’t seen it but it got a positive review on flashpanel HD site. I mean, if LG Cinema 3D can provide both comfort AND high quality image at the same time, it’s definitely going to tackle down Samsung and Panasonic. I wonder what Samsung and Panasonic will do in reaction…