[citation][nom]frozenlead[/nom]This is pretty awesome, but I'm so-so on the subject. I mean, cameras are a cheap (cheap as in morally, not monetarily) way to get some cash for the government, but then again, you are breaking the law when you speed...but then again, everyone speeds, and everyone knows it. Honestly, who sticks to the speed limit?[/citation]
Yeah but what does that really mean to speed or speeding. I think it's a misnomer at best, if a speed limit is posted at 40mph and your doing 41mph, does that really constitute speeding? Keep in mind that your car isn't officially calibrated for accuracy under the law. Most laws or codes written account for a +- 5mph to allow for this discrepancy. How often have you found yourself traveling down that same road only to find a few miles down it's all of a sudden 45mph, yet the road hasn't changed or your surroundings. The problem isn't so much that your speeding but that there is no consistency or mph rating is politically motivated. The was an incident in Montana I believe, where a stretch of road had no speed limit, the moral oral's were in an uproar, but the fact was that accidents were reduced exponentially, lowing insurance claims, and health care costs. It was short lived because to governor retired, and his incumbent re-instated the speed limit only to incur a rise in both accidents and death rate. Go figure?