[citation][nom]tokenz[/nom]Its not funny. Sony packed too much into their console and tried to charge an arm and a leg for it. Microsoft didnt and is now adding it when the tech is cheaper. Therefor cheaper consoles. Also maybe if sony would have developers make a crap ton of decent games for it Microsoft would be in last place.[/citation]
Wow, you completely have the tail wagging the dog. The big loser was Microsoft. Your "insight" is preposterous. I'll give you a hint. Go buy an HD DVD player. Guess how long consoles are around. Guess how long video formats are around. Guess which device made Blu-Ray players much more common than HD-DVD. Guess how many VCRs are sold. Guess how many times this is compared to game consoles. Guess who makes money on Blu-Ray. Every one of the millions that sell, regardless of manufacturer.
Not only that, Sony has been selling the PS3 pretty well lately, so they lost sales for a few years, and gained huge royalties because their standard succeeded. The standard Microsoft backed failed.
So, sorry, Sony did the right thing. Take a look at the bigger picture. Even if they completely sacrificed PS3 it would have been worth it, but they didn't. It's doing fine now.