[citation][nom]longerlife[/nom]"No, censorship would be the deliberate supression of information. Not wanting to associate with something because of its content is a fundamental right of people and companies."Censorship is the removal, blocking or hiding of something, the fact that they will not allow this app is censorship. Having an open app store would NOT mean they are associated with a particular view or ANY view, merely that someone has produced an app with a particular view (otherwise Google could be said to associate itself with every view on the internet). Anyway I am done with this 'debate'... you have all got caught up in your views on healthcare and have ignored the pertinent issue altogether, which is that Apple has unilaterally decided that it can ban an application based on someone's political views. It's not like the app advocated violence or illegal activity...AGAIN: I have no qualified view on America's health care system.[/citation]
From Dictionary.com
cen⋅sor⋅ship /ˈsɛnsərˌʃɪp/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sen-ser-ship] Show IPA
Use censorship in a Sentence
See web results for censorship
See images of censorship
–noun 1. the act or practice of censoring.
2. the office or power of a censor.
3. the time during which a censor holds office.
4. the inhibiting and distorting activity of the Freudian censor.
cen⋅sor /ˈsɛnsər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sen-ser] Show IPA
Use censoring in a Sentence
See web results for censoring
See images of censoring
–noun 1. an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds.
2. any person who supervises the manners or morality of others.
3. an adverse critic; faultfinder.
4. (in the ancient Roman republic) either of two officials who kept the register or census of the citizens, awarded public contracts, and supervised manners and morals.
5. (in early Freudian dream theory) the force that represses ideas, impulses, and feelings, and prevents them from entering consciousness in their original, undisguised forms.
–verb (used with object) 6. to examine and act upon as a censor.
7. to delete (a word or passage of text) in one's capacity as a censor.
NONE of those definitions apply. As I said before, Apple is a private (not government owned) company, not a government agency. Just as an individual can decide what s/he wants to read or listen to or watch (or not read or listen to or watch), so can a private company decide what products it will and will not carry.
Again: This is not censorship. They are not supressing the information. It is still freely available out there, they just don't want to carry it in their stores. What you saying is analogous to saying that a religious or children's bookstore is practicing censorship for not carrying Playboy or Hustler magazine. Or that an adult bookstore is practicing censorship for not carrying copies of the Bible, or the Book of Mormon, or the Tanakh, or the Torah, or the Qur'an.