grieve
Distinguished
[citation][nom]o0RaidR0o[/nom]I couldn't disagree with most of you more! If I'm assuming the time line in the article is correct, the workers opened the manhole and then proceeded to place the safety cones, sorry but that is ass backwards, cones first then open the manhole...DUH! It's like driving down the highway and then putting on your safety belt, or bicycling half a mile before putting on your helmet, or only after take off or landing do you place your safety belt on. Bottom-line the open manhole was left unattended. It shouldn't matter if she was texting, or her attention was disrupted by a passing siren, or someone calling out her name.[/citation]
I think you and I are the only two people who think this way...
It just does not matter what she was doing... a manhole was left unattended.
WHAT IF it was a 4 yr old riding down street on his bike?
What IF it was you driving your car and ran into it? doin 40 your not gunna swerve in time.
The point is: this girl is an idiot but it should not have been possible to happen.
OHHH here ya go... your TXT'ing walking down the sidewalk when some drunk fool runs you down. It's your fault because you were TXT'ing? get your heads out of your asses.
I think you and I are the only two people who think this way...
It just does not matter what she was doing... a manhole was left unattended.
WHAT IF it was a 4 yr old riding down street on his bike?
What IF it was you driving your car and ran into it? doin 40 your not gunna swerve in time.
The point is: this girl is an idiot but it should not have been possible to happen.
OHHH here ya go... your TXT'ing walking down the sidewalk when some drunk fool runs you down. It's your fault because you were TXT'ing? get your heads out of your asses.