"Wireless upgrade"

[Adam]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.rogersatt (More info?)

Hi all,

I have a Nokia 8390 phone and would like to get one of those camera phones
from Rogers Wireless. Could someone give me some recommendations?

I went to two Rogers stores to check out the Motorola V220. Not sure if
it's because the phones have been handled by a lot of people, but they were
quite badly scratched; even the dial pad has lost most of the numbering. If
you are a V220 user, can you tell me if that's the way that phone is (i.e.
easily damaged)?

Secondly, want to know about the V220 reception. I live in a condo and have
been getting POOR signals with my Nokia 8390. Quite frustrating. How's the
reception for V220?

I only know about the V220 and V300 camera phones. If you know of a better
camera phone, please recommend.

Thanks for your help!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.rogersatt (More info?)

your receptions should increase significantly with an upgrade to a 850/1900
phone form your 1900 only phone. v300 is a good phone but ugly, v220 is
pretty good and from what I hear the samsung x426 is a good little phone.
Also check out the SE T637.


"Adam" <nospam1979@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:evKdnb5BtuK6BfvcRVn-gg@rogers.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Nokia 8390 phone and would like to get one of those camera phones
> from Rogers Wireless. Could someone give me some recommendations?
>
> I went to two Rogers stores to check out the Motorola V220. Not sure if
> it's because the phones have been handled by a lot of people, but they
were
> quite badly scratched; even the dial pad has lost most of the numbering.
If
> you are a V220 user, can you tell me if that's the way that phone is (i.e.
> easily damaged)?
>
> Secondly, want to know about the V220 reception. I live in a condo and
have
> been getting POOR signals with my Nokia 8390. Quite frustrating. How's
the
> reception for V220?
>
> I only know about the V220 and V300 camera phones. If you know of a
better
> camera phone, please recommend.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
>
>