YouTube Scores Huge Victory in Copyright Case

Status
Not open for further replies.

icepick314

Distinguished
Jul 24, 2002
364
0
18,930
0
yeah....let's all shoot the messenger...

not to mention sue gun and weapons manufacturer for murder, McDs for making kids fat, and God for pedophile priests...
 

Ragnar-Kon

Distinguished
Apr 13, 2010
201
0
18,830
0
Seems to me that the owners of the copyright should be policing the inter webs to find their illegal copies of their material...

...which is exactly what Viacom did, and they notified YouTube, and YouTube removed the videos the next day...

... so I fail the see what the issue is.
 

joe nate

Distinguished
Oct 17, 2009
28
0
18,580
0
"mere knowledge of the prevalence of (copyright violations) in general is not enough"

Seems like this is a reasonable statement. Youtube does comply with removing things when requested. They do not tell the user to upload copyrighted videos. Simply lacking the man-power to remove all of them on a daily basis is not willful intent to infringe upon the copyright.

In most cases with intellectual property, it's the intellectual property's owner that's responsibility to protect that property. If you come out with the copyright "windows" then its your job to make sure no one else tries to sell their products with your name. The court will back you up. But if you don't care about your name, you can not take them to court. There are no "intellectual property police" that go around issuing "cease and desist" letters and charge people for using other people's intellectual property. That's the responsibility of the intellectual property holder. If they issue the complaint, youtube is and has been compliant with removing said issues.

Expecting more from youtube is like selling paper to someone and then being held liable for what someone printed or wrote on that piece of paper.
 

micper

Distinguished
Jun 24, 2010
1
0
18,510
0
Money grabbing @!$*^$*%(*&(&!!!
but it's good to know that there is still some justice left in this world !!!
 

Pyroflea

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2007
341
0
18,930
0
Okay, so YouTube hosting copyright material is legal, yet TPB and MiniNova hosting copyright material is illegal? Yeah, that makes perfect sense.
 

jevon

Distinguished
Jun 6, 2004
22
0
18,560
0
I seem to recall there being a lot more to this story a year or two ago, something about how Youtube/Google actually had records showing Viacom themselves had uploaded some of the videos in question to Youtube. Anyway, glad to hear the Internets won this one!
 

the_krasno

Distinguished
Sep 29, 2009
300
0
18,930
0
Once I uploaded a video of Valve's "Meet the team" promos for Team Fortress 2. It got taken down due to a Viacom copyright claim. I appealed, remarking that those trailers are property of Valve and giving links proving it. My video was allowed then =)
 

overclockingrocks

Distinguished
Oct 9, 2006
232
1
18,840
18
So the copyright holder makes a claim and the infringing content is then promptly removed. Yet the entity that was informed of the infringment and took action is still somehow liable? WTF
 

loomis86

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2009
233
0
18,830
0
[citation][nom]Ragnar-Kon[/nom]Seems to me that the owners of the copyright should be policing the inter webs to find their illegal copies of their material......which is exactly what Viacom did, and they notified YouTube, and YouTube removed the videos the next day...... so I fail the see what the issue is.[/citation]


money
 

h8syningup2comment

Distinguished
Jun 24, 2010
1
0
18,510
0
"This is an important victory not just for us, but also for the billions of people around the world who use the web to communicate and share experiences with each other,"

How exactly does this affect "billions" of people?
Last time I checked, Youtube was not available in many countries outside the U.S. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but U.S. law is "U.S." law, not "World Law". Court decisions, landmark or otherwise, made in the United States don't affect law in other countries, especially since most of the world uses civil law as opposed to the U.S. which uses common law.
 

poseidon2112

Distinguished
Mar 21, 2009
12
0
18,560
0
"How exactly does this affect "billions" of people?
Last time I checked, Youtube was not available in many countries outside the U.S. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but U.S. law is "U.S." law, not "World Law". Court decisions, landmark or otherwise, made in the United States don't affect law in other countries, especially since most of the world uses civil law as opposed to the U.S. which uses common law."


Wow....since you are obviously too stupid to figure it our for yourself, I'll spell it out for you.

Youtube is available in most countries. In fact so many countries, that billions of people have access to it.
http://mashable.com/2007/05/30/youtube-bans/

Also, when youtube is forced to take down one video by an american company (citing american law), then nobody can watch this video. Even those outside of america. So yes, american law can affect the rest of the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
asab1 Streaming Video & TVs 1
Pazic Streaming Video & TVs 0
Intequr Streaming Video & TVs 2
Mrkaru Streaming Video & TVs 0
O Streaming Video & TVs 2
J Streaming Video & TVs 1
S Streaming Video & TVs 1
Dominick1990 Streaming Video & TVs 0
J Streaming Video & TVs 0
K Streaming Video & TVs 1
S Streaming Video & TVs 0
K Streaming Video & TVs 1
S Streaming Video & TVs 2
S Streaming Video & TVs 3
C Streaming Video & TVs 2
C Streaming Video & TVs 2
F Streaming Video & TVs 1
S Streaming Video & TVs 1
W Streaming Video & TVs 1
C Streaming Video & TVs 5

ASK THE COMMUNITY