[citation][nom]reprotected[/nom]9 Reasons not to get it:1. Insecure2. Spent how long on development?3. Unoriginal4. FireFox exists5. Firefox exists, wait, did I say that already?6. Chrome exists, but just get FireFox because Google is evil7. Opera exists8. Benchmarks mean nothing9. Something better exists[/citation]
1. insecure? man you must be a security expert you already ran it though a gambit of test, and 2nd it's a beta.. not a RC not everything is there.
2. spent time on development why don't you look at all the hype they have been trying to drum up for quite some time over their redesigned engine.
3. Unoriginal? really so what you are saying is everyone should be using opera, as most browser ideas are first done on the opera browser are then re done better by another browser.
4. Firefox lol well according to your number 3 firefox is the last one you want to be using as frankly it's the most unoriginal browser as it goes.
5. well you must suffer from really bad memory because you can't remember what you typed or read why you typed.
6. Chrome exists, but just get FireFox because Google is evil. so by "logic" of google is evil don't use chrome but wait use chrome? no wait firefox becuase clearly mozilla is also not a cooperation looking to make money.
7. well according to your number 3 this is the only browser allowed, although frankly opera wasn't the first web browser so maybe we shouldn't use it because it's not original. so i guess we need to use "WorldWideWeb" browser first developed.
8. benchmarks mean nothing. and if IE was slow i bet they would mean everything
9. something better exists. Well how do we measure better without a benchmark? and when we discount anything that is so called unoriginal leaving only one choice.
After following your logic my only choice is to kill john lennon.