Does anyone here honestly think a CEO needs to be answering emails sent from customers? Try to fathom, if you can, that this is not the only customer to ever get Randall's email address, and that if the CEO's address gets out, then he could potentially have millions of emails bombarding not only his email account, but crippling the exchange servers handling the email. As low level manager, I can tell you that I struggle on a daily basis to keep my enterprise email volume down to a level that doesn't prohibit further emails from being sent/received while also doing my actual job. Even aside from that, since this guy is getting paid millions a year, wouldn't you much rather him be about the intended business of a CEO; developing the company's vision, giving direction, and developing a strategy, not to mention trying to make shareholders and the customers happy? I had better not find out any at&t CEO is sitting at his desk, ignoring phone calls, canceling meetings, and postponing key decisions so he can take the time to answer gigabytes worth of emails to customers who are usually making the point that they are already canceling their service, when they should be empowering low-level customer service reps & managers to resolve those issues on a case by case basis. That's what customer retention departments are for. Maybe it sound heartless and condescending from the average consumer's point of view, but if someone is getting paid top dollar, they had better be doing top dollar work, not answering emails to angry customers. Even the best companies might get unhappy customer complaints sometimes, and maybe even occasionally a CEO might personally answer a truly heartwarming email (maybe some hopelessly disabled young war vet, begging for a special phone -- forgive me for lack of a better example) but for the most part, I don't want a multi-millionaire executive doing "12$/hour Executive Relations college student" work. I personally wouldn't bust my behind in corporate America for countless years to make it to the highest executive level, just to be criticized because I do not want unsolicited emails from customers or anybody else. What if Randall spent a year as a CSR, answering the phones but still getting his full benefits package, or if he sat a a mall kiosk, barely selling 1 phone a day? Then people would be in an uproar because he's making all that money and doing peon's work. As nice as it would be, we can't always have it both ways. I work for at&t, and even as unhappy as I am with certain company practices, I do try to look at things from a practical standpoint as often as possible.