G
Guest
Guest
You know, this whole issue boils down to viewing distance to screen. The best example of this for me is my 1080p 24" LCD computer monitor (I have both a 22" inch at 1600 X 1050 and the 24" at 1920X1080 - I am and have been for five years now a dual monitor junkie).
Anyway, the great thing about LCD monitors, especially those with anti-glare coating is that you can sit VERY close without any eye-strain. I find now that the most impressive movie experience in my house is sitting about 2 feet away from my 24" 1080p monitor and watching Blue-ray films. Both my wife and I agree it is EXACTLY like the big screen experience. Our 42" HDTV (not 1080p, bought 4 years ago) looks fantastic displaying HD content such as HD cable stations, Blue-ray discs, or even progressive scan conventional DVD's. But we sit about 12 feet away so for us a 42" 1080p would not seem like an improvement, we would need a larger screen.
You know, this is off the subject a bit but for most people I know like my wife, friends and family, they are STILL impressed at 1080i or 720p resolution. Blue-Ray is not taking off like DVD manufaturerers and studios had hoped, and the reason seems pretty clear to me: why introduce an improvement to a standard that people already think is very good? It's like they are trying to fill a need THAT DOES NOT EXIST. Now when de-rigor screen sizes become 70" and bigger (and of course they eventually will), THEN we can talk about the merrits of Blue-Ray. But until then, I really think they jumped the gun on this.
Again, I DO enjoy Blue-Ray on my 1080p 24" computer monitor sitting 2 feet away. But I'm not typical. Most people don't sit that close to their monitor. And most people don't sit six feet away from their 50" LCD 1080p TV. But the day will come. Like I said, there are STILL many, many folks in this country who are only NOW upgrading to a HDTV (1080i or 720p). To them, the differences compared to their "old-fashion" TV are DRAMATIC. The next step to them is a need that does not yet need to be filled.
My $.02,
Nick
Anyway, the great thing about LCD monitors, especially those with anti-glare coating is that you can sit VERY close without any eye-strain. I find now that the most impressive movie experience in my house is sitting about 2 feet away from my 24" 1080p monitor and watching Blue-ray films. Both my wife and I agree it is EXACTLY like the big screen experience. Our 42" HDTV (not 1080p, bought 4 years ago) looks fantastic displaying HD content such as HD cable stations, Blue-ray discs, or even progressive scan conventional DVD's. But we sit about 12 feet away so for us a 42" 1080p would not seem like an improvement, we would need a larger screen.
You know, this is off the subject a bit but for most people I know like my wife, friends and family, they are STILL impressed at 1080i or 720p resolution. Blue-Ray is not taking off like DVD manufaturerers and studios had hoped, and the reason seems pretty clear to me: why introduce an improvement to a standard that people already think is very good? It's like they are trying to fill a need THAT DOES NOT EXIST. Now when de-rigor screen sizes become 70" and bigger (and of course they eventually will), THEN we can talk about the merrits of Blue-Ray. But until then, I really think they jumped the gun on this.
Again, I DO enjoy Blue-Ray on my 1080p 24" computer monitor sitting 2 feet away. But I'm not typical. Most people don't sit that close to their monitor. And most people don't sit six feet away from their 50" LCD 1080p TV. But the day will come. Like I said, there are STILL many, many folks in this country who are only NOW upgrading to a HDTV (1080i or 720p). To them, the differences compared to their "old-fashion" TV are DRAMATIC. The next step to them is a need that does not yet need to be filled.
My $.02,
Nick