Hello, I am recently looking to buy a laptop (mostly for studies) - no graphics or CPU intensive tasks, except rarely. However I do need a reasonably powerful laptop with enough space to last for a while.
I have narrowed down my choices to a few (from Futureshop) - Canada.
This is my primary choice:
http/www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/hewlett-packard-hp-15-6-amd-quad-core-a6-3420m-laptop-g6-1d44ca-grey-g6-1d44ca/10208019.aspx?path=f021d44e28a00aca90f54e01e9db9f4fen02
Secondary:
http/www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/acer-acer-aspire-14-intel-pentium-b950-laptop-e1-431-4875-black-e1-431-4875/10206025.aspx?path=1e6f9564d84971ead750f512bf852de8en02
My choice depends on the following:
Both laptops look like good choices but some little assurance would be great
the 2nd laptop has more RAM, and a faster CPU however I noticed that it doesn't have as much cores or as much CPU cache. Is there much performance difference between the two laptops and if so which is a better choice? Does the 1st laptop with its quad core and larger CPU cache mean a noticeable difference in performance between the two?
The 2nd choice has an Intel graphics solution, while the other has a Radeon 6520, I won't necessarily be looking for graphics performance here, but it would be a nice thing to have.
So overall should I stick with the 1st choice, the graphics and the extra HDD space is my current reason to favor it over the other but if it has no noticeable difference I am willing to look at the 2nd choice.
PS Also a slight concern, I have experience with Acer and IBM laptops but are HP laptops reliable in the long term? (2+ years)
Thanks!
I have narrowed down my choices to a few (from Futureshop) - Canada.
This is my primary choice:
http/www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/hewlett-packard-hp-15-6-amd-quad-core-a6-3420m-laptop-g6-1d44ca-grey-g6-1d44ca/10208019.aspx?path=f021d44e28a00aca90f54e01e9db9f4fen02
Secondary:
http/www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/acer-acer-aspire-14-intel-pentium-b950-laptop-e1-431-4875-black-e1-431-4875/10206025.aspx?path=1e6f9564d84971ead750f512bf852de8en02
My choice depends on the following:
Both laptops look like good choices but some little assurance would be great
the 2nd laptop has more RAM, and a faster CPU however I noticed that it doesn't have as much cores or as much CPU cache. Is there much performance difference between the two laptops and if so which is a better choice? Does the 1st laptop with its quad core and larger CPU cache mean a noticeable difference in performance between the two?
The 2nd choice has an Intel graphics solution, while the other has a Radeon 6520, I won't necessarily be looking for graphics performance here, but it would be a nice thing to have.
So overall should I stick with the 1st choice, the graphics and the extra HDD space is my current reason to favor it over the other but if it has no noticeable difference I am willing to look at the 2nd choice.
PS Also a slight concern, I have experience with Acer and IBM laptops but are HP laptops reliable in the long term? (2+ years)
Thanks!