Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (
More info?)
"Jack Zwick" <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:jzwick3-887224.04340305012005@news1.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <NeNCd.958$W32.346@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>> news:wyBCd.16473$_3.191863@typhoon.sonic.net...
>> > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>> >
>> > In <ivBCd.317$W32.126@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Tue, 04 Jan
>> > 2005
>> > 18:45:34 GMT, "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Cingular states that it is unable
>> >>to return my original phone
>> >>after the phone is exchanged.
>> >>
>> >>Cingular states that replacement phones may be reconditioned.
>> >
>> > FYI, that's common practice with consumer electronics.
>>
>> Do you think that's fair?
>> I don't think so.
>> I bought my Motorola Model V400 GSM brand new,
>> out of the box, I still have the box, with Cingular stamped
>> on the upper right hand corner.
>> I did pay $200.00 for it, I gave up on the Cingular promised rebate.
>> I didn't buy a 2nd hand phone, so why should Cingular replace
>> their cellphone with a 2nd hand phone.
>
> Because your 7 month old problematic phone was not new.
You mean Cingular sells its customers 2nd hand cellphones?
Because I bought the phone brandnew from a Cingular Authorized Dealer.