Happy0852 :
I had one but make sure it one that fits best for you. You don't want a camera that doesn't work for you. Recommend D5000+ because of HD 1080p Photo
Unless you want to shoot video, 1080p makes no difference, and all of the above cameras can shoot 1080p (though at different FPS). 24 megapixels is what counts in terms of pixel resolution. All of those cameras have that as well (24.2 to be specific). The D3300 had the great advantage of being pretty good, while being cheap. The D5500 on the other hand would probably be something you would keep for longer. It has a pretty darn good 39 point AF system for the price range, and vastly superior high ISO performance. I would get the body only and a 35mm F/1.8 G lens (the DX version, used if you want to save more money). I think you'll like the picture quality more than the kit lens, and I actually love primes. I have a 300mm F/4 prime and a 28mm F/1.8 prime and haven't a problem with either. Sure, you can't zoom out or in for that matter. Cool people can just adapt to this and it really does make you think about you're framing before you shoot. Zooms make me lazy!
Edit: I am not personal a huge sony camera fan. I understand the appeal, but the menu systems drive me nuts, and the idea that you have to pay to get a time lapse app on your camera is just....well it seems pretty dumb to me. You just bought a $600+ camera, and they really need an extra $2.99 from you (don't remember the actual cost, but I think it was actually more than that)?. Besides the size and often the FPS capability on lower price point cameras, mirrorless cameras have little benefit. I am not against them, but just because they are newer on the scene doesn't really mean they instantly produce better images. A lot of people buy them purely because the salesman or friend talks up how this "new technology" will make photos better. Bah. Nothing about a mirrorless camera that makes it take better photos. You do that.