Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (
More info?)
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:43:01 +1000, Deciple of EOS
<decipleofeos@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Tom Monego wrote:
>> Rafe's experience is mine also with an Epson 9000, though i do print from a rip
>> mostly, I have done 84inch canvases from photoshop 7 with no problem.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>Pardon my intrusion but the thread really was about a 7600 Epson. Rafe's
> dogmatic attitude is as bad or no different than Ryadia's. Neither
>person (even you Tom) were / are talking about the thread's header
>really. Epson 7000 and 9000 are not 7600 are they?
The Epson PDF which I cited (and provided a link
for) gives print length specifications for all of
the Epson Wide Format models, from the 4000 on up
to the 10000, using Photoshop, Corel Draw, Quark
Xpress, and Illustrator. In Epson's data, there
is no difference on models from the 7000 on up --
ie., print lenght limits (using Epson driver) are
identical for the 7000, 7500, 7600, 9000, 9500,
9600, and 10000.
>I've hit the wall with my Canon plotter and Photoshop CS at about 1200
>mm so maybe Ryadia was on to something in the first place? There was a
>thread on the Adobe forums about this a few months back. It seems that
>Photoshop CS does indeed have limitations on the size of paper which can
>be defined by the printer. I too used Corel Draw to get over the
>problem. (I don't have illustrator so I can't comment). I think the
>problem is with using a roll feeder. These things (obviously) are
>variable length but you have to define a fixed length in the document.
Read the freaking Epson PDF, for crying out loud.
Unless you'd prefer to argue than actually learn
something.
rafe b.
http/www.terrapinphoto.com