On topic: Isn't this grounds for a lawsuit? Apple asked Facebook if it could use it's APIs for a specific purpose, Facebook effectively said no, then Apple did it anyway. They got sued over a similar issue with the iPhone name...
Also, it seems a bit weird to call them an API, but I suppose thats the best fit. How about a new term? Maybe OWI (Open Web Interface) ?
LOL, so let me get this straight. Facebook has policies in place for accessing its API. Apple wanted to work around those policies, but couldn't come to an agreement with Facebook, so in the end, they [strike]jailbroke facebook[/strike] did it anyway and then were surprised when they got banned? Gosh, I guess it doesn't feel so great to get bullied yourself, now does it Apple?
Read guys. It says the API is typically open, meaning Apple (or anyone else) has access in the first place without permission. However, Facebook denied Ping because it was asking for excessive access to Facebook which is not allowed. When Apple did not conform to the requests of Facebook, they were then blocked. Apple didn't have to do any "jail-breaking" or any work around to use Facebook Connect.