First 3D HDTVs Sell Out in One Week

Status
Not open for further replies.

adamh

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2010
3
0
18,510
It seems like people have been touting both the virtues of 3D as a viable format, and sounding its death bell since it first hit theaters. I have a feeling, though, that with modern technology improving the medium we might actually see it here to stay. As to the market share it may take, who can say? I'm kind of hoping for some kind of 3D video conferencing tech someday.
 

adamh

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2010
3
0
18,510
It seems like people have been touting both the virtues of 3D as a viable format, and its inevitable failure since it first hit theaters. I'm of an opinion that with modern technology improving the medium we might actually see it here to stay. As to the market share it may take, who can say? Personally I'm hoping for some kind of 3D video conferencing tech to make its way to commercial availability.
 

shadow187

Distinguished
Sep 16, 2009
33
0
18,590
[citation][nom]Intel_Hydralisk[/nom]In unrelated news... demand for migraine medication skyrockets.[/citation]
This.

'Fox8 News: Child learning deficiencies; 3-D to blame? More at 5.'
 

pink315

Distinguished
Oct 26, 2009
20
0
18,560
[citation][nom]maydaynomore[/nom]I want to know what makes that Plasma TV a 3DTV.[/citation]

120 hz display, and some nify glasses hahaha
 

pink315

Distinguished
Oct 26, 2009
20
0
18,560
[citation][nom]pink315[/nom]120 hz display, and some nify glasses hahaha[/citation]
"nifty"

Just to be a little more specific as well, you need a minimum of a 120hz screen to display 60fps content twice in which the glasses are used as a shutter to display what is necessary for each eye to display the 3d effect. Plasma or lcd does not matter, although I am curious to see which will remain the value holder :)
 

MxM

Distinguished
May 23, 2005
110
0
18,630
When mass produced this technology will cost $100 extra at most, with the most expensive component is the glasses themselves. When you buy $1000+ 50 inch TV, it is stupid not to pay this $100 to get 3D. The breakthrough is the speed of the LCD TV (plasma always had it) so that the images can be switched very fast, and BR discs that can have HD stereo video on single disk with multiple layers.
It is here to stay.
 

starryman

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2009
155
0
18,630
How is $2,899 considered "whopping"? Let's not get carried away with the superlative. I think that's a good deal and the evidence is clear - it's sold out.
 

JohnnyLucky

Distinguished
May 30, 2007
990
0
18,930
People with bad eyesight might have a problem. If the focal point is off a few people might suffer headaches, dizziness, and nausea. Wonder if they can develop #D without the glasses.

On another note, how much do extra glasses cost?
 

p05esto

Distinguished
Jun 11, 2001
186
0
18,630
Man, and I just bought a $3500 LCD 55" with local diming in fall.... amazing TV, but 3D sounds like fun for the change I specnt :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.