This is gonna shock any of you who brush off Apple computer as an option in this review, but I deployed 5 MacBook Pros last week with Windows XP as their default OS.
Why? Several reasons, but the final straw that meant Lenovo, Dell, or HP lost the business: none of their machines could drive an external 30" display in native resolution (that being either the Apple or Dell 30").
This specific reason certainly doesn't apply to the majority of laptop users and likely sound trivial, but at my company we invest in getting the best equipment for key employees and this includes big displays.
You should have seen the users faces when they got these machines instead of a ThinkPad. They were thrilled, because they think Apple hardware is great but are more comfortable w/ working in WinXP. And in this case, they personally felt they got the best of both worlds. And in one specific user's case, she's able to fall back to OS X to do Final Cut Pro video editing.
Now, I realize this is my first post to Toms Guide... but I had to chime in here with my recent experience and how it relates to this review.
I'm going to guess the first fundamental gripe about opting for Apple hardware is the cost factor. All I know is, if any other PC company made an identical machine in every physical aspect (performance, aluminium enclosure, asthetic, etc) but charged a few hundred bucks more for it and called it their "pro line" or something... they would sell.
Regards,
Joe.