Help MobilityGuru Redesign Psion's Iconic, Ultrasmall 5mx

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fluppeteer

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2006
15
0
18,560
I liked the 5mx when I first saw it - I knew several people who had them.
Lest we look at it with rose-tinted spectacles, though...

1) The screen was awful. Thinking about a replacement, are we after
something that's easy to use outside (transflective), or the best
overall picture quality (probably backlit)?

2) The keyboard, although the slide design was genius, wasn't
perfect. The way you hit your thumb on the case every time you
tried to use the space bar, for example. I think we could grow it
slightly (so long as it's still pocketable). FWIW, I couldn't use the
5mx keyboard properly, it was slightly too small. I *do* use a
Libretto 70CT all the time (still) - there's not much in it.

3) EPOC32 is actually not that bad an OS, as evidenced by the
ubiquity of Symbian. I have to admit that a device like this would
be much more tempting as a "real" PC, though - it's much easier
to do it with an ARM (see Nokia's 9000 series), but there's really
no PC of this size out there. Would it be the ideal PDA? No. Would
it be very useful? If cheap enough, I'd buy one.

My thoughts...

a) The 7.2" 1280x768 screen on the Toshiba Libretto U100/U105 is
very nice. You can always up the "dpi" setting in Windows. Bear
in mind that many apps can't handle screens that are any smaller
than this - go for 800x480 or similar, and there'll be problems with
too much being unusable.

b) The hard icons are pointless - fill the lid with the LCD as much as
possible. Some PDA application could overlay it when not doing
generic Windows stuff.

c) Since there's no room for a trackpad (although a trackpoint has
its merits), I'm resigned to the touch screen. Agreed that if it can
be made to rotate, table-style, that would be a bonus - but that
may not play with the sliding keyboard. I'd seriously consider a
scroll wheel and possibly some custom buttons on the side of the
case - they make a massive difference to the usability of the
P800/900 series of Sony Ericsson phones. Otherwise your hand
is in the way of the screen. Mind you, a trackpad on the back of
the screen might work.

d) Agreed with a low voltage Core chip - and underclock it as much
as possible (certainly no fans). It can run faster when docked.
If power can be kept low enough, charge it over USB (at least on
an overnight trickle charge). Power consumption is *much* higher
than even old ARMs, so you'll never get much life out of anything
that size. Problem is, XP struggles on anything slower; Vista will
be even worse (although it might solve the scaling issue). Linux
is fine on my P120MMX Libretto, but I wouldn't say no to being able
to dual-boot. Recent attempts at dual-chip devices (ARM + Pentium)
are interesting for PDAs, but are probably too complicated here.
VIA chips are interesting, but actually aren't incredibly low power
in comparison with a low-clocked Core, and can't be sped up when
running from mains. No attempt at clever graphics is going to work
in this form factor, but XP doesn't really need it for basic running.

e) Go with mini-USB (possibly OTG, with mass storage so you can
sync without powering up).

f) Doubt you'll ever get it to go with AA batteries - not enough
capacity. Li-ion is the way, however nice the idea of buying
replacements in an emergency might be.

g) 802.11 is a massive usability benefit, although not turned on for
long if you like battery life. Bluetooth gives you the possibility of
cell phone modems, external keyboards and mice, etc. Big big
win.

h) VGA (probably via a break-out) is useful, although there are
CF-card and USB VGA adaptors. Go HDMI 1.3 mini-connector
if you're feeling posh. Video playback's going to be a bit
limited, though. A real VGA adaptor is always useful - you
never have the break-out cable with you when you want to
show someone something. DVI would be nicer, but that would
take up half the side of the device!

i) Even if the device isn't a couple of mm bigger, I'd love to see a
slightly bigger keyboard. The butterfly design from the 701C
Thinkpad might be a useful starting point. Keep the stability of
the 5mx design, though.

j) Keep the compact flash slot. You can get all kinds of adaptors,
including SD card readers. (Also including 802.11, but that's
probably useful enough to integrate.) Cardbus is probably too big,
and ExpressCard still too rare.

k) Much as I'd love solid state, it's still pretty expensive. I'd either
go for a 1.8" drive (where?) or stick to low capacity - even 8GB
is probably plenty for this kind of device. You can always add a
big CF card for more, or run an external USB drive. Solid state
has the benefit that it's easier to build into the case shape.

l) 512MB as a minimum. I'm wary of cost, though. 1GB would be
nicer, but this is never going to be a high-end PC, and would
be pretty poor as any kind of primary machine. My Libretto
is fine with 32MB and a big swap file, mainly because I don't
try to run XP on it. :)

m) 1" is possibly too thick. My Libretto is about that, and it's not
pocketable. Shave it down a bit and the other dimensions don't
matter quite so much. The Libretto has a full 9mm HDD and a
PC-card slot, so I'm sure things can be shrunk.

n) I think £4-500 would work (so yes, $1000). £300 more so, and
depending on the keyboard I might even be tempted at that point
(so long as I can dual-boot into Linux). This is a gadget/second PC,
so it's not what people will put the big spend into.

I'd also like IrDA, but that's because some of us are still stuck in
the stone age. :)

Interesting idea. I'll give it some more thought over the weekend.

Btw, people are aware of what Psion did with CE with the Netbook,
yes? Very nice devices for web surfing.

--
Fluppeteer
 

benjamin

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
18
0
18,560
How the HELL are you going to read 6 font at 1280x anything on a screen that's only at most 7 inches wide?

I think you're finding the point, one which so many have missed by a ****ing country mile. It's good fun reading these cloud-cuckoo land featuresets though.

The point is: the 5mx is, was and always will be for a demographic who won't be reading Tom's Hardware.
 

axilon

Distinguished
Sep 9, 2006
9
0
18,510
If you give this thing a the ability to have a video-out you could easily keep it at 640x480, and that would be more then reasonable.. not to mention viewable.
 

Brain1

Distinguished
Oct 7, 2006
1
0
18,510
Sounds Great, nice to hear of another clam shell type device.

I am a proud owner of an HP 200LX 4mb and a HP Jornada 728. I am a Land Surveyor and the HP 200LX was the work horse of our industry for a long time. The 200LX is very tough and hard to break. The Jornada 728 i'm alittle more careful with and could never survey with out in the field.
I still use both. The HP Jornada 728 is very nice however the screen is not bright enough to work well in full sun. So make the device that works very well under any light conditions. Also are you actually thinking of making a clams shell device with a Windows XP OS. That would help compability that kills PDAs. With my poor Jornada 728 I'm stuck with the same OS and Internet Explorer. The 200 Mhz Strong Arm on it is also getting slow. But the 2 Compact flash slots are awsome for storage. So adding two forms of storage cards is a good idea. If it is going to have Windows Xp on it it would be nice to have a PCMCIA slot, so many device can plug in to it
I have a device that has Mobile 2003 and a Xscale processor of 624mhz. It is smoking fast. I couldnt imagine using an X86 on a clam shell device. But again it would be great for compability.

So my suggestion would be Bright Screen, Durablity, PCMCIA, Good Processor either Xscale or X86, Audio output port, USB Host port, USB Client Port, OS Upgradeable, Long Battery Life and actually produced and for sale : )
 

Crashman

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
93
0
18,580
A hugely underclocked Core Solo ULV and GMA950 will be more than enough.

How about a Transmeta?

Speaking of power, the battery pack in the Gateway ultra-portable I was using was a two or thee cell size. The cells they use are the same as used for AA batteries, and the thing ran with a real screen for over 4 hours.
 

moschops

Distinguished
Oct 7, 2006
4
0
18,510
I owned a Psion 3 and then 3a way back in the early 90's - back then a half MB of RAM was a big deal, then much latter I got a Revo. I was always a big fan of:

a) the form factor - great for handheld thumb powered use, and desktop two handed note taking
b) AA battery power - AA batteries are universal, convenient and rechargeable.
c) the software - simple, powerful software completely adapted to keyboard only use.
d) synchronized with a desktop computer from day one - I never lost anything from my Psion.

and all this was over ten years ago. Never mind the multithreaded object oriented OS with a scripting language that kicked Palms *ss - even the modern Palm OS is inferior to Psion's OS.

I now have a Windows Mobile powered T-Mobile MDA - its an okay form factor with some cool hardware inside (WiFi b/g and bluetooth) but it is not as nice form factor as any Psion I ever owned for day to day use (it is no good for typing on a desk), and the software blows. Sure a web browser, media player and email client is nice but so many of the functions of Windows mobile require me to pull out the stylus and start tapping at the screen - even when the full keyboard is available. That is nuts. And damn it the s/w just plain crashes too much, even with 64MB of RAM which is 128x what my Psions ever had!

My vote is for Psion 3a or Revo form factor - both of which were eminently pocketable - and 640x480 or 800x600 screen, external SD only - put in two slots like the original Psions - one for expansion and one for interchangeable media. USB 2.0 is a must. And port Symbian OS (the successor of Psion's OS) to an embedded Linux and run that, I don't want a crippled Win XP on it. Finally put in a WWAN radio - UMTS or something like that because 100% mobile connectivity is what every mobile device will have to have in the future. I'll take that over unrealiable short range WiFi any day.

PS. You're nuts to think you need 1GB of RAM, use Linux running Symbian for compatibility with all that old but still good s/w and you'll need 1/4 of that, if not less.

PPS. If this thing doesn't stay alive for WEEKS with 2 AA batteries and provide DAYS of continuous use then forget about it.
 

Crashman

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
93
0
18,580
What pisses me off is when I pull a dead battery pack out of a laptop and look it over only to discover it's made of a bunch AA batteries soldered together. You pay $180 for 8 double-A's in a custom plastic sheeth? The world must be stoned...
 

moschops

Distinguished
Oct 7, 2006
4
0
18,510
What pisses me off is when I pull a dead battery pack out of a laptop and look it over only to discover it's made of a bunch AA batteries soldered together. You pay $180 for 8 double-A's in a custom plastic sheeth? The world must be stoned...

I think the old NiMH laptop batter packs were like this but not the Lithium Ion ones which have been pretty much standard for five years or so. I don't know why there is no LiON equivalent of the AA, I think it might be because of what could happen if you put one in a regular AA charger - I suspect they might have a high risk of exploding or "going Dell".

Certainly a good number of cordless phones have battery packs that are a bunch of AA batteries sheathed together and you pay $10 for that. Doh!

I have read there is a new battery technology that is Zinc based (Zinc Ion?) and is not only higher capacity but also safer than lithium ion. Should be in mass production by 2008 so maybe there is a hope for a new high capacity AA based on it, just in time for the Psion mx200...
 

Crashman

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
93
0
18,580
Ah, forget all that, I'd take a bunch of NiMH cells strapped together for my auto starter battery if they could just give me the 8-year typical life I get from lead acid. Think about all the extra cranking power, w00t!
 

CrArC

Distinguished
Jun 5, 2006
40
0
18,590
I still have my Psion 5MX, which I bought after a Psion 5, after a Siena...

It was and still is awesome, and the 3rd party software you could find let it do so many things, from becoming a database for chemicals or medical drugs to fairly complex scientific calculations, reading and writing data to phones, becoming a terminal, programming network hubs, simulations of interacting space bodies... blah blah...

The one thing I pined for initially was a little more connectivity. It obviously wouldn't support CF wifi cards and such. If it had wireless and proper network support I could have been totally happy. Eventually I bought a Jornada 680E for the colour screen and PCMCIA slot but was disappointed by the utterly abysmal backlight and the crappy OS.

I would certainly adopt a revamped version of the Psion, I was so crestfallen they abandoned such devices.
 

Frank_M

Distinguished
May 24, 2006
3
0
18,510
A hugely underclocked Core Solo ULV and GMA950 will be more than enough.

How about a Transmeta?

AFAIK they are not making chips anymore.

As I said, I'm not too familiar with ultra-efficient chips, might be better solutions than undervolted Core Solo ULVs.
 

pembers

Distinguished
May 12, 2005
2
0
18,510
I bought a 5mx in 2001, which I still use regularly, mostly for writing novels. They were (and still are) fantastic devices, but I have to wonder if there's much of a market for such a thing these days. Most PDAs nowadays are outsized phones. Those that have QWERTY keyboards at all need a matchstick to use.

The 5mx cost about £400 when it first came out in 1999, or about $600 at the exchange rates of the time - more like $800 now. I'd be reluctant to spend much more than that on a new one.

Those who expect this new device to be a miniaturised laptop are missing the point. Yes, the 5mx was a computer you could put in your pocket, but it was a computer that could do the things you actually needed while you were away from a bigger computer. The main design goals were for it to be small and light, with a long battery life. (Even then, people who'd upgraded from earlier models complained it was too big and heavy, and the batteries didn't last long enough.)

With that in mind, this is what I'd like to see in a new incarnation of the 5mx:
- Keep the overall form factor - clamshell, with a keyboard that slides forward.
- Keep it about the same size and weight. It has to be something you can put in your pocket.

- Keep the keyboard. This was one of the best things about it.

- Keep the touch screen. There isn't room for anything else that does service for a mouse.

- The screen was hard to read on the 5mx, unless you could get a light source in just the right place over your shoulder. It had a backlight, but you had to switch this on, and it ate the batteries. I imagine screens have improved a bit since then :) It doesn't have to be much higher resolution than the original. Seeing as I deal mostly with text, it doesn't even have to be colour - the greyscale screen is one reason the batteries last so long.

- A headphone socket would be nice.

- One, preferably two, USB sockets. This gives a lot of expansion options.

- Some form of removable storage. The 5mx has a CF slot (picture 11 in the slide show). I don't think it needs SD *and* CF - SD alone should be enough.

- One of the frustrations of the 5mx (in fact, all the Psion computers I used) is that the onboard memory doesn't retain its contents without power. It has a backup battery, whose sole purpose is to supply power to the memory while you change the main batteries. Occasionally, the backup battery gets dislodged, with predictably catastrophic consequences when you go to change the main ones. It's supposed to warn you that the backup battery isn't supplying power, but it never does. So the new machine needs either a better warning system, or else some form of non-volatile memory onboard.

- A VGA port might be nice. DVI would be more future-proof, but do you have any idea how big those things are? Allowing for the screws to hold the cable in place, it would take up half of one side of the machine!

- People are going to want to use it as a phone, but this shouldn't interfere with its usability as a computer. So I think anything that anything you need to use it as a phone, which isn't also useful as part of a computer, shouldn't be built into it. A UMTS modem would allow you to make phone calls, but would also let you surf the net, far from any coffee shops with free wi-fi. A Bluetooth headset, on the other hand, is not so useful just for computing, so I think it should be an optional extra.

- Software. This was the other great thing about the 5mx. Considering the OS and hardware were both proprietary, it had a huge selection of third-party programs available. But the built-in applications were so good that no-one ever seriously tried to replace them. They were unbelievably stable, too. In the whole time I've owned a 5mx, I can count on one hand the number of times an application has lost data.

The OS is still around - it eventually became Symbian - but I don't know if it's a good choice nowadays. Please, please, PLEASE don't put Windows on it. Microsoft already have far too much influence. Windows will make the machine just another underpowered laptop with little or nothing to distinguish it from competitors. Put Linux on it, and make it easy to replace or upgrade. Maybe allow it to boot off the SD card, something like a live CD on a PC.

I've been wondering what will replace my 5mx when it eventually dies (I bought two second-hand Series 5's as insurance against that), so I'll be interested to see where this redesign or resurrection goes. Stay true to what made the 5mx so good in the first place, and I'll seriously think about buying one when it becomes available.

Steve Pemberton
http://www.pembers.net
 

moschops

Distinguished
Oct 7, 2006
4
0
18,510
I would agree about phone functionality comments above. It doesn't have to be designed to work as a phone held to the ear, make the phone usable only via headset (bluetooth or not) or handsfree and keep the great form factor.
 

digitalstratus

Distinguished
Sep 26, 2006
2
0
18,510
i think this is a great project

main specs i'll leave to someone else, tho i have soem thoughts

definatly a phone, usable by headset wired or bluetooth

some storage capacity

wireless g at least

as it has to be compatible with windows, i would suggest xp or wm5, but hey give people the option to have linux or whatever if they want

the whole swing screen idea is nice to lend itself more to a pda/phone functionality, but if not, a second low power screen for basic info of call and so forth

its always nice to see some exciting new designs and ideas
 

fluppeteer

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2006
15
0
18,560
How the HELL are you going to read 6 font at 1280x anything on a screen that's only at most 7 inches wide?

I think you're finding the point, one which so many have missed by a ****ing country mile. It's good fun reading these cloud-cuckoo land featuresets though.

Have either of you actually ever used a 200+dpi screen? Because they're perfectly usable, through the twin expedients of 1) changing the dpi/font settings in Windows (or your OS of choice) and 2) moving your head closer (would you really use something with a 7" screen at the distance of a normal laptop?)

I'm happy using my Libretto's old 6.1" VGA (130dpi) screen at full laptop distance; I normally bring it closer, but the pixels get distracting. I have no issues with my T221 (204dpi, 22") although I wouldn't want to sit too far back. If I could perch it on my hand without breaking my wrist, it would be fine. Don't mistake small text for pixellated text - the sharpness of a 200dpi screen makes small text perfectly legible.

The reason I, at least, have been advocating something like the screen on the U105 (which is, after all, a laptop intended for running Windows XP) is that for a Windows box, developers (and web designers) target XGA as a minimum screen resolution, and SXGA is more common. I have experience with trying to use a smaller screen (Librettos, Zaurus, Palm, UIQ, Newton) and it's very restrictive. By all means allow for a bit of ctrl+scroll wheel resizing and for people to fiddle the dpi settings (I prefer having real-estate rather than smoothness), but if the pixels aren't there then there's a problem.

This is mostly the case for UIs that assume higher resolution - i.e. running a desktop OS (Windows, Linux, OS X etc.) or platform-independent stuff (html, PDF, etc.) - PDA-centric applications obviously work much better, and I'm not suggesting it shouldn't ship with things that can be used without squinting in that way. I'm just saying that making this an arbitrary PDA turns it into yet another Journada/Nokia 9000 series, and they're not big sellers. Nor have they needed much more processing power to do the job of being a PDA than they had when they were first launched. A real PC in the same form factor (whether or not us geeks would actually leave XP as the primary OS), which I believe is possible, is a much more tempting device. If it weren't, my Newton carry case wouldn't be being used for holding a Libretto.

The point is: the 5mx is, was and always will be for a demographic who won't be reading Tom's Hardware.

Speaking for the number of my friends who own(ed) 5mxs and read this site, I'm not sure where that idea came from. The only reason I don't count is that my fingers are slightly too chubby.
 

millerja01a

Distinguished
Jun 28, 2006
3
0
18,510
Back in '98, I worked for a large financial market as a sys admin and I needed a kick ass PDA to keep everything together. The 5mx was my choice and bought it with my own cash. The best $480 I every spent. I still have it though the keyboard is a little twitchy.

The clamshell should come back. Not only did the clamshell work but the quick buttons along the screen edge worked well too. The current hardware buttons of PDA/Smarphones are too limited and require the user to take the time to learn how to remap buttons to access common functions faster. The only device out there that comes anywhere close to the 5mx is the HTC Wizard inspired devices(I've used the Cingular 8125 for 6 mos).

Windows Mobile still has no built in task manager, 5mx did have an Alt-Tab like Windows.

IMHO, the Psion 5volution (my name for it) shouldn't run any of the current mobile OS'es, they are too limiting. Epoc32 is a well designed OS and if it was made opensource for the 'Nix heads to modernize it for todays hardware, we could see some marvelous things.

I agree with the concept drawings for adding VGA out and USB 2.0. Definitly BT for PAN with headphones, cell, PC connections. Wi-Fi, maybe but I would either make that a trim level option (5volution Premier).
Connectivity was one the things that killed the 5mx from moving into modern times.

Batter life? Despite the problems with Sony's Li-Ion batteries, the technology works for form factors like the 5mx. The backup watch battery though should stay.

Capacity. Std model should have 256MB( this will make it affodable). How about making the expansion a Mini-SD slot. Premier would come with 1 GB internal.

Screen. Still the same measurements but resolution can be set for Low, Med, or High(800x600,Premier lvl) 32bit color.

How about a camera to the rear of the unit? Would only work when clamshell is opened. 1.2Mp, video capable.

Pricing,
Std - $449
Premier - $789(faster CPU, better screen, Wi-Fi, more RAM/storage)

UMPC is a nice idea but won't work in the long run. MSFT will drop it. Watch for stuff out of the Koreans. I think they see the need to break the mold and try new things.

The traditional PDA/Smartphone formfactor is dying. Just like BetaMax and OS/2 sometimes a design is so good that competion can't beat it so they defame it to program the consumer against it. But when brought back, it's still compelling.

I hope device makers happen across this forum because you'll hear what folks don't like about your current offerings and what we'd like to see.

May the 5mx live once again!!!!
 

blancj

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2006
7
0
18,510
I flatly disagree with the phone usage.
If you look at phones they are designed around the consumer cycle and something new and different every few months.

If someone really needs a cellular connection use bluetooth to link to a cell phone.
 

fluppeteer

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2006
15
0
18,560
In my previous rants, I'd not really answered the actual questions. Having had a weekend to ponder it...

We still seem to have two threads going on, intermingled. One is discussing a true replacement for the 5mx: a clamshell PDA. The other is discussing getting an x86 laptop into the 5mx's form factor.

In my mind, the former is obviously possible, because the 5mx *was* one, and producing a faster, colour-screened version isn't desparately challenging with more modern technology. This is effectively what the Nokia 9000 series is, and to me it's therefore a "solved problem", and not (to me) very interesting. I don't need one of those - I have a Sony Ericsson P910i, and I don't need the keyboard that badly. A 640x200 screen would be nice, but I can surf on the P910's 208x320, and if I was going that route I'd probably put up with the bulk of a JasJar (and Windows Mobile), even if the keyboard isn't quite as good, for the extra features and full VGA screen. As I've said before, I can't quite use the Psion 5's anyway. Making something like the 9500 or JasJar but "a bit more like a 5mx" wouldn't add much for me. People may be interested in discussing it, but frankly you can always buy a folding bluetooth keyboard and add it to one of these devices, and you'll end up with a better typing experience than the 5mx anyway. Other than the keyboard I doubt there's enough to differentiate it, given that the other devices are cell phones as well.

On the other hand, a "real" PC that you can stick in your pocket, and run XP (and dual boot to Linux), is far more intriguing. It would be much easier to make something run Win2K, but that would get laughed out of the shop these days no matter how practical.

Given that I'm talking about the "real PC" concept, I'd answer the questions:

1) At least 1024x600, preferably nick the Libretto U105's 1280x768. 800x600 is the absolute minimum for running Windows apps, but at least 1024 across will make an enormous difference both to running Windows apps and web surfing. 1280 is the new common width, and pretty much guarantees everything will work okay. A transflective alternative would work better outside and massively help the battery life, but probably ruin the Windows experience; LEDs are probably the way unless you go with (dim) white electroluminescent sheets (like the green one on the original). [A PDA can make do with much much less resolution, although the more the prettier. Web browsing is the big reason to have at least 800 across. Transflective would help here, and absolute picture quality is possibly less a benefit than battery life when compared with a PC system.]

2) Unless Via have anything lower power than a ULV Yonah, Intel it is. This will be limited by battery technology, and cooling (although a metal case - preferably with some grooves on the back - to act as heat sink will help). It's a huge chunk of the price, but what can you do? 5.5W is a lot for a PDA CPU, so down-clock it and hope for the best, possibly with a "turbo" mode when plugged in. If you need fans (unless they're on the docking station) you're in trouble. [For a PDA, take your pick, but we're probably talking a fast-ish ARM variant.]

3) Memory will come down to space, price, and power consumption. No room to make it upgradable. 1GB would be extremely generous, and 512MB is probably the lower limit. You can always set up the CF-card as a swap drive. [A PDA can use much less - 128MB or so.]

4) Solid state storage if it doesn't price the device out of the market. Don't aim too high - 4-8GB is lots if you're not trying to play games or do a lot of Photoshop. There's always CF drives and USB external enclosures. A small HDD would have some appeal if it can fit in, so long as it's resilient enough (this will probably be more abused than a usual laptop) and the shape isn't a problem. Also HDDs can handle large numbers of accesses (e.g. swapping) better than some solid state drives. Large sizes are, IMHO, useful for video playback (not going to work for long with the battery available - ARM and media processor based systems are much more efficient), big audio collections (if this is really the way you want to re-load your iPod nano) and photo storage (somewhere to download your holiday snaps - I've used a laptop for this before). This isn't a machine for video editing, high end photo editing, or modern games. Making the internal drive remote mount as a USB mass storage without booting up would be a nice touch. [PDA: go solid state, for resilience. Probably don't need that much.]

5) WiFi: Yes, it makes a massive difference to plug-and-play. Even if it could be added by CF card or USB, if it fits in the space (it's on the P990, so it should) it's a huge win. So long as it's usually turned off. Bluetooth is even more useful (use a "real" keyboard or mouse) - especially, use a mobile phone as a modem. Don't try to make a Windows PC work as a phone - everyone has a phone anyway, and you don't want to have to wait for XP to un-hibernate to make a call. [PDA: WiFi is less critical, although it's still nice for a bit of surfing. Bluetooth is still a big winner.]

6) You'll never run an x86 (at least, a useful one) off AAs. If you did, they'd be too expensive to keep replacing, or too annoying to keep recharging. There *are* Li-ion AA cells, which would give you an emergency replacement opportunity if you're two minutes from finishing your presentation and you're nearer a supermarket than a charger, but it's got to be easier to go with Li-ion or lithium poly, just from a form factor point of view. Sell an optional battery pack, either to plug into the charger socket or replace the internal battery (as a thicker lump). Ship with a car charger and, ideally, the ability to trickle charge over USB. [PDA: A decent colour screen will kill standard cells, although the ability to stuff in some AAAs in an emergency is something I miss from old Palms. Still, I think to keep it think you're better with something like a cell phone battery.]

7) I'd lose the SD card reader, and possibly ship a complementary SD-to-CF card reader with it. If that's still not enough space, lose the CF card slot - it's very nice to have for upgrades, but USB can replace most things these days (although they may be higher power). Agreed with the docking station suggestion, although again it's amazing what you can run over USB these days. It should all fit (although the narrow end of the slope at the front will be a bit challenging), but the space left for the battery will be a big question. If I'm reading the spec correctly, the Core Solo is about 3.5cm per side - huge compared with an ARM, but not that much of the total footprint, especially if mounted on the back of the board to heat-sink it. My life's too short to research the chipset and ram sizes in detail, but they look okay, so long as device A doesn't fry device B that's right next to it. 7.5"x3.5"x1" is pretty big compared with what's inside a Libretto once you've taken out the full 2.5" HDD, the pcmcia slot(s) and the battery. If possible, the thickness is obviously the thing to shrink - 1" is a thick device to stick in a trouser pocket, but even 2cm would be much better, and 1.5cm trivial. The Newtons were only 8"x4"x1.2", and everyone remembers them as being huge; my Libretto (a full, old, PC) is 8.3"x4.5"x1.3". [Without using x86 processors you could probably make something half the size.] Tip for both: don't run the PCB the full width, and use ribbon cable for the bits on the end. Then it can flex a bit without damage, so long as the screen is protected.

8) For a PC, $1000 sounds right, if possible. It's not as powerful as some mini-machines. I'd sooner have a machine I can use at a price I can afford than something all powerful that I can only aspire to - don't spend a fortune giving fractional price gains. Sell the docking station and spare batteries as extras. Don't go for the faster ULV Core Solo. Certainly don't add 80GB of solid state storage! This is nobody's primary PC - better it be a handy toy for lots of people than a workhorse for a few. I doubt making it for much less is feasible. I'm curious about the prices quoted before - lower than I'd expect, although I've never tried to source this kind of thing.

I might try doing some drawing myself.

Out of interest, dumb question: is this idle chatter, or (potentially) actually going to happen?
 

Baloo

Distinguished
Apr 8, 2006
5
0
18,510
There does seem to be an interesting divide here between those that want a fully fledged PC in the shape of a 5mx and those that want something usable, affordable and reliable. Basically it's a divide between those that want another Sony Vaio style PC (great from a gadget POV) that will be redundant in 3 months and those that actually used (and still use) a fantastic device that delivered what it promised and nothing more. I have used many mobile phone and organisers. I am a gadget addict but none have ever lasted as long or have delivered anywhere near to their promises as much as the 5mx (and the 3 and 3c before it) did.

Personally I would happily settle for a modernised version of the 5mx. Colour screen, modern processor, decent connectivity etc... as long as the software is as good as the EPOC OS and it lasted more that 8 hours on a charge. (Maybe the ability to take AA's when you couldn't charge the Li-ion?)