PC Personality Clone: It's Ethical, It Works, But Is It Enough?

bgerber

Distinguished
Feb 10, 2006
105
0
18,630
0
PC Personality Clone makes perfectly legal copies of parts of a Windows computer to another Windows computer. However, it may not do everything you expect.
 

zenmaster

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2006
41
0
18,590
1
This was a "terrible" article.

It never states what this product does!
It says it does not copy applications, registry keys, etc.. etc....

From what I can tell it copies a "User Profile" from one PC to the other.
Is this all it does? Does it do more? Is this what it really does?

If all it does is copy a user profile, then an article on how to transfer profiles should have been written. If it does more than this, the article should have provide a little discussion on what this may be.

This looks like an "Infomercial".
Was this just paid advertising because there is certainly no techinical information or analysis in this story.
 

Windaria

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2001
38
0
18,580
0
Of course it was a terrible article... it was written by Barry Gerber, author of the "who designed this crap" series, and someone who has no business writing for a hardware site since he is blatantly non-technical.

That said... I didn't even realize he was the author (don't usually check) until I had looked at the ONE PAGE WRITEUP on this product, realized it was basically just a poorly written one-page news release, and thought "who wrote this crap".

Oh, it is the guy that always asks "who designed this crap". well, the answer to both my question and yours is people like you Barry. Please spare the audience and cease writing for Toms Hardware until you are able to actually write a well thought-out, detailed, and reasonably technical article.
 

Windaria

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2001
38
0
18,580
0
Sorry... I just realized the enormity of this...

THERE ARE ONLY TWO PARAGRAPHS!!!

What on earth? What editor would EVER post that? That isn't even worthy of a news release... boy. It is sad watching Toms Hardware slide further and further into oblivion.
 

vanka

Distinguished
Apr 27, 2006
6
0
18,510
0
Granted the "article" was not the best that Tom's ever had, but what about the product being reviewed? From what I could tell, all it does is transfer user files and setting from one computer to another; and for only $65! Wow!

Excuse me, couldn't you do the same thing with XP's File and Settings Transfer Wizard using a $15 flash drive? Plus you wouldn't have to buy a new transfer license for every source PC.

Now the custom USB cable which allows you to see the other computer's hard drive could come in handy in those situations when a network (or crossover) isn't available, but no way in he!! am I paying $65 for it.
 

TechnologyCoordinator

Distinguished
Feb 22, 2006
9
0
18,510
0
Please track through all the slides, because everything you need to know about this product is included in them.
I beg to differ, the slides were helpful, but not sufficient.

So basically it's a USB cable that connects one computer to another. If I want to transfer files I do it for free using something called a "Local Area Network".
 

Windaria

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2001
38
0
18,580
0
Please track through all the slides, because everything you need to know about this product is included in them.
I beg to differ, the slides were helpful, but not sufficient.

So basically it's a USB cable that connects one computer to another. If I want to transfer files I do it for free using something called a "Local Area Network".

Not only that, but relying on picture slides, each with a short sentence included, for the body of an article is just lazy journalism.
 

zenmaster

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2006
41
0
18,590
1
Granted the "article" was not the best that Tom's ever had, but what about the product being reviewed? From what I could tell, all it does is transfer user files and setting from one computer to another; and for only $65! Wow!

Excuse me, couldn't you do the same thing with XP's File and Settings Transfer Wizard using a $15 flash drive? Plus you wouldn't have to buy a new transfer license for every source PC.

Now the custom USB cable which allows you to see the other computer's hard drive could come in handy in those situations when a network (or crossover) isn't available, but no way in he!! am I paying $65 for it.
Yes, part of the problem may be the product but why review a product if it
has no features. Support.Micrsoft.com will tell you how to copy a profile. Either this product does nothing else and Toms should not be writing about it since it serves no purpose except to waste the money of Tom's readers or it does serve another purpose that was not revealed.

Either the product should not have been written about or if it does have a function, it was not revealed.

Sadly some readers may not be technical enough to know that it does not really add any use.
 

vanka

Distinguished
Apr 27, 2006
6
0
18,510
0
Yes, part of the problem may be the product but why review a product if it
has no features. Support.Micrsoft.com will tell you how to copy a profile. Either this product does nothing else and Toms should not be writing about it since it serves no purpose except to waste the money of Tom's readers or it does serve another purpose that was not revealed.

Either the product should not have been written about or if it does have a function, it was not revealed.

Sadly some readers may not be technical enough to know that it does not really add any use.
I'm not disputing that the review was total cr@p, it's just that all the other posters at the time were focusing on the review itself and not on the product being reviewed, which itself is cr@p. When a reviewer is forced (or chooses) to review a product as useless as this, he should state in the review that it's useless and that there are other cheaper and better alternatives.
 

ir_efrem

Distinguished
Dec 13, 2005
9
0
18,510
0
I'm not disputing that the review was total cr@p, it's just that all the other posters at the time were focusing on the review itself and not on the product being reviewed, which itself is cr@p. When a reviewer is forced (or chooses) to review a product as useless as this, he should state in the review that it's useless and that there are other cheaper and better alternatives.
Agreed vanka

I'm just wondering if i missed something in the whole point of a review. Tech info, comparissons, what about transfer rates on this PoS, writers thoughts on usefulness of said product. I'd choked up bile that tasted better than the poor writing and review i just read here.

All in all the review led me to think toms got paid to tell people about a product, as was mentioned before *infomercial*

i use fairly robust ad/pop up blocking software so i dont have to look at garbage, maybe we need some "Tomshardware Content" blocker software as well so our time is not wasted.

yes i am being harsh and toms is about to loose me as a reader this crap is a trend and i cant be the only one feeling the same way.
 

glockman

Distinguished
Aug 22, 2006
6
0
18,510
0
Not that I have ever used it but don't many of these types of products do the same thing as the "Files and Settings Transfer Wizard" built into XP??
I don't really see the need, in the more than 15 years I have been working on computers I have always preferred to do a clean install and set things and move things myself (for business & home) it isn't that hard unless you have a bunch of illegally obtained software that you don't have disks for!

Does XP Wizard suck?
 

zenmaster

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2006
41
0
18,590
1
Well there can be lots of reasons.

SID transfers so you can replace one PC with another and keep it various network managed apps assigned.

There can be lots of custom info in Profiles that are quite an issue to recreate.

However, I dont know if this software transfers SIDS, Accounts, how it handles encryped files/data, etc., etc., etc..

All I know is it copies "some parts of Windows". :roll:

Well, it will copy over a desktop wallpaper setting for sure :>
 

slaphappy

Distinguished
Oct 22, 2006
53
0
18,580
0
For $50 I can buy a copy of Symantec Backup Exec or Acronis TrueImage, both of which have bootdisc environments which can fully retarget a system volume to new hardware by automatically cropping out the the drivers and replacing them with a preselected list on file, and a few other tricks so windows doesnt freak out when it starts up on totally different hardware, and have all my applications and windows itself running on a completely new machine.

Add about 5 more minutes of a few driver updates and a couple of reboots to get the kinks out and youre done.
 

tcsdoc

Distinguished
Nov 10, 2005
1
0
18,510
0
This is another of those products aimed at the uninformed individual. Anyone with a little more than a basic understanding of Windows will know this product is worthless. By the time I went through all the registration/authentication procedures I could have copied the files over on a flash drive. Why such a heavy handed protection scheme on such a trivial product?
 

mordenkhai

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2006
3
0
18,510
0
First and foremost, that product seems to be a complete waste.

Second, I dont know the authors history but if there is any chance he reads these posts please please understand you are not clever. The entire PC Cloning/Living Entity Cloning and Ethics "thing" you thought you were working, did not work. So never ever author another article in which there is so little actual content and such a large use of a poorly thought out gimmic again. I want my 5 minutes back for that slideshow. You sould have added 3 more sentences to the main "article" and not needed the slide show.
 

Holmwood

Distinguished
Jun 24, 2006
1
0
18,510
0
One thing no one's mentioned... you have to go through to the seventh (out of 12) image before you get through all the "activation code" stuff. That's a sad and telling thing.

Apart from that, as others have said, first, this seems a useless product, additionally crippled with endless activation code hurdles. Second, the idea of having to read through the slideshow to find out what this thing does... well... that's ridiculous, and, frankly, comes off as arrogant.

I don't blame the author (who was probably stuck having to review this software); I do blame the editor. To tell us that... then have the negligible content and fluff that is the slideshow concerning a junky product... that suggests to the readers that the editor thinks our time is of little value.

Sorry to be harsh; this is a great site, and I'm sure the editor and author have done great work. This was a departure.
 

DevilsAdvocate

Distinguished
Oct 23, 2006
1
0
18,510
0
The rather ironic thing about talk of 'ethical' copying of systems and suggesting, by both the ariticle writer and posters here, is that you are not allowed by the Ghost license to copy/clone a drive to use in ANOTHER system.

I'm not saying it does not work, just that the license has a very specific clause on this. So to be within the limits of the product license you can only clone to a drive that you are replacing/installing in the system that has Ghost installed on it.

This is actually a change that showed up a couple of versions ago. Not all cloning software has this limit.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P Laptop General Discussion 11
D Laptop General Discussion 4
T Laptop General Discussion 6
M Laptop General Discussion 2
jjamesdias Laptop General Discussion 9
C Laptop General Discussion 4
S Laptop General Discussion 2
A Laptop General Discussion 3
S Laptop General Discussion 1
A Laptop General Discussion 7
K Laptop General Discussion 4
T Laptop General Discussion 2
M Laptop General Discussion 2
K Laptop General Discussion 2
V Laptop General Discussion 6
C Laptop General Discussion 1
C Laptop General Discussion 1
C Laptop General Discussion 2
H Laptop General Discussion 3
S Laptop General Discussion 1

ASK THE COMMUNITY