I beg to differ, the slides were helpful, but not sufficient.Please track through all the slides, because everything you need to know about this product is included in them.
I beg to differ, the slides were helpful, but not sufficient.Please track through all the slides, because everything you need to know about this product is included in them.
Granted the "article" was not the best that Tom's ever had, but what about the product being reviewed? From what I could tell, all it does is transfer user files and setting from one computer to another; and for only $65! Wow!
Excuse me, couldn't you do the same thing with XP's File and Settings Transfer Wizard using a $15 flash drive? Plus you wouldn't have to buy a new transfer license for every source PC.
Now the custom USB cable which allows you to see the other computer's hard drive could come in handy in those situations when a network (or crossover) isn't available, but no way in he!! am I paying $65 for it.
Yes, part of the problem may be the product but why review a product if it
has no features. Support.Micrsoft.com will tell you how to copy a profile. Either this product does nothing else and Toms should not be writing about it since it serves no purpose except to waste the money of Tom's readers or it does serve another purpose that was not revealed.
Either the product should not have been written about or if it does have a function, it was not revealed.
Sadly some readers may not be technical enough to know that it does not really add any use.
I'm not disputing that the review was total cr@p, it's just that all the other posters at the time were focusing on the review itself and not on the product being reviewed, which itself is cr@p. When a reviewer is forced (or chooses) to review a product as useless as this, he should state in the review that it's useless and that there are other cheaper and better alternatives.