blazorthon
Distinguished
[citation][nom]testerguy[/nom]You guys are ridiculous. Constantly trying to call Apples products overpriced, having as they do, the overall fastest CPU/GPU combination of any phone ever released, even 6 months after it came out. Yet the second anyone points out the obvious fact that Android phones are cheaper, you go on rants about how much you paid.You can't have it both ways. If your Android phone was more expensive than an iPhone, perhaps you're the one who bought an overpriced device. If it wasn't, then clearly throwing around figures like $700 and $800 (off contract) figures is irrelevant if the new iPhone costs more.As it happens, iPhone users earn, on average, more than Android users.And finally, the person who thought that $200 plus a contract was less than $800 without a contract needs to go back to school.[/citation]
Well, I never said that Androids are better than iPhones because they are cheaper. Many Androids are cheaper, but not the top models. For example, my Samsung Transform was free with a contract, but it has a mere fraction of the processing power of it's bigger brothers. With Apple, if you don't want to spend a lot on the iPhones, you are limited to the older models. iPhone users tend to make more money than android users? Well, that doesn't surprise me, because most Android users have cheaper Androids. My Samsung Transform, without a contract, was being sold for under $250 (I think it was going for about $200 or $175, but I don't remember. Either way, it was dirt cheap for a smart phone).
Honestly, none of these phones are worth the large prices they go for. It's all a very high profits thing and the prices are way over-inflated. Moving on, the iPhones before the 4S were generally weaker than Androids because new Androids jsut keep coming out with better and better hardware, but Apple only makes new iPhones with better hardware so often and besides the A5X chip, they had seriously been neglecting CPU performance for a while now.
[citation][nom]Alchemy69[/nom]Don't you think that Apple deserve to profit from their inventions? They invented the mobile phone, the tablet, the mp3 player and in a few years time they will have invented the television, too.[/citation]
I assume you're being sarcastic, but that joke is getting old and you might have been a little too subtle for some if you were being sarcastic.
Well, I never said that Androids are better than iPhones because they are cheaper. Many Androids are cheaper, but not the top models. For example, my Samsung Transform was free with a contract, but it has a mere fraction of the processing power of it's bigger brothers. With Apple, if you don't want to spend a lot on the iPhones, you are limited to the older models. iPhone users tend to make more money than android users? Well, that doesn't surprise me, because most Android users have cheaper Androids. My Samsung Transform, without a contract, was being sold for under $250 (I think it was going for about $200 or $175, but I don't remember. Either way, it was dirt cheap for a smart phone).
Honestly, none of these phones are worth the large prices they go for. It's all a very high profits thing and the prices are way over-inflated. Moving on, the iPhones before the 4S were generally weaker than Androids because new Androids jsut keep coming out with better and better hardware, but Apple only makes new iPhones with better hardware so often and besides the A5X chip, they had seriously been neglecting CPU performance for a while now.
[citation][nom]Alchemy69[/nom]Don't you think that Apple deserve to profit from their inventions? They invented the mobile phone, the tablet, the mp3 player and in a few years time they will have invented the television, too.[/citation]
I assume you're being sarcastic, but that joke is getting old and you might have been a little too subtle for some if you were being sarcastic.