[citation][nom]toastninja17[/nom]I am personally a happy AT&T customer with a 2G iPhone and am very happy with it, and any issues I've had with it haven't been any major ones; in other words, I can live perfectly fine with them. However, to sstym's comment, yeah ok Verizon might have more coverage than AT&T, but I'm sorry...location has nothing to do with speed, it simply makes it more convienient to get 3G speed that is slightly slower that AT&T's IN THOSE AREAS.[/citation]
Location does. What if I was a businessman that travels constantly in the US and I need to download attachments, or anything on the go? Makes perfect sense to have 3G then to me at least.
[citation][nom]toastninja17[/nom]On a more personal note, I would respect Verizon far more than I currently do if they weren't so f*cking arrogant about things. IMO, it seems like they're the bullies of the wireless network world, and at the moment AT&T seems like they're the victim and they're crying about it. But that's because Verizon are being assholes.[/citation]
Thing is, Verizon is right about 3G in the square mile. AT&T has been around. They should have well over the 3G tower system than they have now. They don't invest in their own technology unfortunately. the way I personally see it is AT&T is the asshole here for not providing consumers the adequate equipment for their phones hence dropped calls and barely any 3G coverage. The customers are the ones who are really suffering.