ghostface24
Distinguished
i think the problem is the article itself.
there's no doubt between all of us that the iPod has it's drawbacks and it's bonuses. the same goes for every DAP that exists. everyone has it's plusses and minuses and it's up to us to pick the ones that we prefer best.
choosing any of these hard drive based machines will give you a device that will meet most of our expectations and more. whether we choose iPod, iRiver or whatever machine is out.
it's this aprticular article that really takes the cake. this writer blindly ignores the plusses and blasts the iPod's faults. (YES. EVERY DEVICE HAS IT"S FAULTS) and than proceeds to recommend a player that isn't even in the same category of player.
this is sloppy writing. shows bias and a real lack of research. it's more of a "letter to the editor" type article than an editors or writters report.
this type of article should never make a news site and should be left where it belongs, somewhere on some forum
OK, pluses...
It plays it's own DRM-encoded Music
It has a scroll wheel
It is small
Plays mp3, aac, aiff, wav
hmmm...is that all, am I missing something
The writer of this article doesn't surround all flaws such as MP3 LAME errors which do occur, it's battery life is low for a flash player, the screen is too small.
I'm not flaming, but there are hardly any positives.