Canon Kit Lens beats Nikon in every test.

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

Sorry...it's just that Rich hasn't posted in the last few days and I didn't
want to break the continuity of this newsgroup.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

On the Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:31:26 +1000, "Steve Franklin"
<honkey@lips.com> wrote:

>Sorry...it's just that Rich hasn't posted in the last few days and I didn't
>want to break the continuity of this newsgroup.
>
>

Thats rich!
---------------------
Remember Glencoe.
Visit:
http/members.aol.com/Skyelander/glencoe.html
---------------------

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"Angus" <macdonald@1692.co.uk> wrote in message
news:m827g196oqse2hsi1okgn3iiubs8f321ah@4ax.com...
> On the Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:31:26 +1000, "Steve Franklin"
> <honkey@lips.com> wrote:
>
>>Sorry...it's just that Rich hasn't posted in the last few days and I
>>didn't
>>want to break the continuity of this newsgroup.
>>
>>
>
> Thats rich!

I was starting to get a bit worried that he realised he was a troll and had
thrown himself under a bus. ;-)

 

[Charles]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:31:26 +1000, "Steve Franklin" <honkey@lips.com>
wrote:

>Sorry...it's just that Rich hasn't posted in the last few days and I didn't
>want to break the continuity of this newsgroup.
>
>
>
>
>
Maybe sigma came out with a new camera.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"Charles" <ckraft@SAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:05d8g1pvjav26fu310lb63pjcpiioh9e4b@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:31:26 +1000, "Steve Franklin" <honkey@lips.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Sorry...it's just that Rich hasn't posted in the last few days and I
>>didn't
>>want to break the continuity of this newsgroup.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Maybe sigma came out with a new camera.

Not until early 2006.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:31:26 +1000, "Steve Franklin" <honkey@lips.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Sorry...it's just that Rich hasn't posted in the last few days and I didn't
>>want to break the continuity of this newsgroup.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Maybe sigma came out with a new camera.

Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:yf1Ne.9755$p%3.38039@typhoon.sonic.net...
>
> Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
> rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.

They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In article <yf1Ne.9755$p%3.38039@typhoon.sonic.net>, SMS
<scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

> Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
> rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.

Who cares?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In article <wP6Ne.11$KX7.7@fe10.lga>, Peter A. Stavrakoglou
<ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote:

> They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
> next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.

Are they going to bump it from 3.4MP to...4? 4.5?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In article <wP6Ne.11$KX7.7@fe10.lga>, Peter A. Stavrakoglou
<ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote:

> They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
> next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.

WOW! A whopping 5.2MP. So by Sigma math, that comes out to 15+MP?

 

[Stacey]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

Randall Ainsworth wrote:

> In article <yf1Ne.9755$p%3.38039@typhoon.sonic.net>, SMS
> <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
>> rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.
>
> Who cares?

Probably several dozen people here who will never use one.
--

Stacey

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In article <wP6Ne.11$KX7.7@fe10.lga>, ntotrr@optonline.net says...
> They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
> next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.

Like that Polaroid x530?
--
http/www.pbase.com/bcbaird

 

[Charles]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:11:09 -0400, "Peter A. Stavrakoglou"
<ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote:

>"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
>news:yf1Ne.9755$p%3.38039@typhoon.sonic.net...
>>
>> Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
>> rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.
>
>They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
>next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.
>

something to put on my list. Right beneath silicon film.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"Brian Baird" <no@no.thank.u> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6eec4c6a18db7b9898b7@news.verizon.net...
> In article <wP6Ne.11$KX7.7@fe10.lga>, ntotrr@optonline.net says...
>> They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
>> next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.
>
> Like that Polaroid x530?

You cannot compare Sigma to the company that produced the Polaroid x530.

 

[dylan]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

>
> I was starting to get a bit worried that he realised he was a troll and
> had thrown himself under a bus. ;-)
>
>

Anyone seen any reviews of the best buses for this ? ;O)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

Charles wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:11:09 -0400, "Peter A. Stavrakoglou"
> <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>>"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
>>news:yf1Ne.9755$p%3.38039@typhoon.sonic.net...
>>
>>>Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
>>>rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.
>>
>>They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
>>next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.
>>
>
>
> something to put on my list. Right beneath silicon film.

Well just to stir the pot a little ...

Why would it be the SD7 if their first model was the SD9 and that was
followed by the SD10? Wouldn't the logical progression be the SD11?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"no one" <noone@nowhere.nohow.invalid> wrote in message
news:11gcdv5cdckl9af@news.supernews.com...
> Charles wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:11:09 -0400, "Peter A. Stavrakoglou"
>> <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:yf1Ne.9755$p%3.38039@typhoon.sonic.net...
>>>
>>>>Funny. Actually the Sigma SD7 (5.2 megapixel Foveon sensor) has been
>>>>rumored to be coming soon, but that was six months ago.
>>>
>>>They're hoping to have it by Christmas but most probably the beginning of
>>>next year. It is coming, there's no doubt about that.
>>
>>
>> something to put on my list. Right beneath silicon film.
>
> Well just to stir the pot a little ...
>
> Why would it be the SD7 if their first model was the SD9 and that was
> followed by the SD10? Wouldn't the logical progression be the SD11?

One might think that but the numbering system seems more akin to the body
size rather than a succession of numbers. The new SD will have a smaller
body than the SD9 and SD10. Although the model number is different, it is
an upgrade from the SD10, not a downgraded consumer model.