Congressmen Want Warning Labels on All Games

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

herniter

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
3
0
18,510
[citation][nom]dimar[/nom]Wow, the corruption has no limits. It sounds like a way to sneak taxes on violent games, as a next step.[/citation]

I was going to say this but they beat me to it. Tax on products that can make you agressive.
 

markdj

Honorable
Mar 19, 2012
7
0
10,510
Putting a giant violence warning on games all the way down to E will only further confuse people since it will make it seem like those games are on the same level as M rated games. with current ESRB ratings there is no confusion.
Also they really need to get over this whole fear of videogames, it has nothing to do with making real people more violent.
 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
774
0
18,940
[citation][nom]wmalinowski[/nom]Maybe we warning label on congressmen for stupidity......[/citation]
you beat me to it " you can't fix stupid "
i think a rider amendment needs to be attached to this before it sees a vote
1 all politicians will come with a warning, rating, and voting % affiliation based on their past performances.
2 all foods will be rated with an obesity rating system and if your fat or slightly over weight, no twinkies for you, you will not be allowed to purchase them or eat them and police will have a cause to beat every calorie of it off you if you are caught eating them.
3 all books will be be rated with the ESRB system and you are not allowed to buy or borrow if you don't meet the criteria.
if this doesn't shame any and every politician into the fascist communist policy that it is then putting a big half swastika with a sickle thru it should get the point across this is unacceptable policy and the people voting for it will gain a fascist communist party reputation.
 

g-thor

Distinguished
Nov 7, 2008
118
0
18,630
So all games other than those rated Early Childhood are "extremely" violent? Really? Auditorium is rated E - is it extremely violent? Katamari Damacy is extremely violent? Little Big Planet? Really?

Pass a law that requires all politicians to devote a minimum of 1 hour of playtime of each game they want to control before they can even write a law about it. Require them to work from real, hands on knowledge.

Warning - off topic: While we're at it, start taxing lobbyists at a 95% income tax rate.
 

n3ard3ath

Distinguished
Dec 11, 2008
118
0
18,630
Breaking News: Congressman comes up yet again with an idea that serves no purpose whatsoever to justify his highly overpaid "job".
 
G

Guest

Guest
"Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, "

The bill says that the labels will be enacted not later than 180 days after the Act becomes law, not 180 days after the game is rated by the ESRB.
 

livebriand

Distinguished
Apr 18, 2011
282
0
18,930
Even for E rated games? This is ridiculous. (fyi, has anyone heard how the RIAA wants ISPs to monitor internet traffic for anti-piracy reasons? I knew that they'd try to pull something like that quietly after SOPA failed....)
 

tk1138

Honorable
Mar 20, 2012
23
0
10,560
[citation][nom]belardo[/nom]Considering the MILLIONS of people all over the world who play GTA and other shooters (about 130 million PS3 & 360 consoles combined / 65m each)... wouldn't that mean we would have about 12~15 million mass-murderers? Or even a million?No... we get about 1-2 a year or so that is blamed on "games". I made about 500 kills last night with online gaming against other humans. I've never shot or killed another human being in my life.Compared that to about 9000 people killed by guns each year in the USA alone?Yeah, we NEED stronger gun laws... hand guns are not for hunting. And going against the govt... well, that doesn't work. The US Military has far bigger toys than ANY civilian... A militant extremist may have hundreds of AR-15s in his trailer-home... a few rounds from an AH-64 Apache will take care of him quick.[/citation]



so i guess with your retarded logic the Vietnamese lost the Vietnam war...o wait thats right the usa with all its chemical weapons (agent orange) and its bombs and fancy black rifle (m16) and all the technology we STILL lost the war against a group of people who trekked much of their resources on their BACKS....

o wait its called asymmetrical war fare...and it works...guerrilla warfare

FACT: second amendment is for defense against govt tyranny, and overthrow of said tyranny should it come to that point....


if you dont like freedom then get the F out of the usa...i hear slaves cant own guns go be a slave fool...freedom in an of it self is a risky endeavor, failure is possible...deaths are inevitable...that is why with freedom comes the freedom to defend oneself...
 

cpatel1987

Distinguished
Feb 2, 2010
92
0
18,610
I don't mind labels like that, unless, wait a minute...ITS NOT ENTIRELY TRUE! Notice theres no word "may" in that statement? Even cigarettes say they "may" cause cancer.

Cigarettes are labeled because, they actually can cause lung damage and cancer.

How many studies have disproved the video games and violent people theory? A LOT.

This is harmful bill because it downright perpetuates a lie to the uninformed.
 

svdb

Distinguished
Apr 24, 2009
93
0
18,580
@tk1138: no no no, retards like guns, because they're attracted by the sense of power they procure. Hence the acronym N.R.A.: National Retards Association.
As everyone knows, the best defense is to attack, and that's why the ones who have guns shoot the ones who don't, just to make that point. Only a true retard can at the same time scream "USA Number One!" and have so little faith in the values of his country that he feels the need to deal expedite justice himself by killing his wife, his neighbor, his child, his co-ed, or an entire class room.
Your sense of freedom is fake. You and the ones like you are not the guardians of liberty, you’re a liability against it.
 

belardo

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2008
1,143
0
19,230
[citation][nom]jacekring[/nom]We are losing more and more of our constitutional rights every day, why are you promoting for them to take another from us? (The right to bear arms) ~~ last time I read the CONSTITUTION of the united states it CLEARLY said that the government can not make laws to inhibit peoples right to bear arm[/citation]
So you are saying any idiot or terrorist in the USA should have guns? A brain-damaged person should have a gun, a 5 year old should have a gun? Is that it?

Show me in the past 3-5 years, the number of gun-right issues that have come up. And compare that to the number of anti-womans' right bills have come up and PASSED.

The gun laws in the USA are pathetic... thanks to the NRA. I've been to gun shows, I have gun collecting friends, whatever. And yeah - I had an AR-15 at a gun show helping a friend look for accessories for it and some CREEP comes up to me and asks if he could BUY IT FROM ME. Why? Because it wouldn't go through any background checks.

In the USA, its easier to get a GUN than it is to VOTE! That is bullshit.

There needs to be regulation for gun purchases and should REQUIRE a licence to buy and own a gun. (A) trained in how to use the fire arm,
(B) trained in the laws of using the gun,
(C) An IQ test and mental stability test... so we don't have another zimmerpussy.
(D) How many guns you can own that are NOT historical (to prevent Joe Bob from buying 1000 guns so he can resell them on the street). That doesn't prevent anyone from buying a gun for "protection" or hunting.

If you are a felon, no gun for you. If you are an IDIOT or have mental problems, no gun for you. If you are a non-US Citizen, no gun for you. If you are under the age of 18, no gun for you. If you have a police record, no gun for you.

If you have a gun, without the licence... you get in trouble. If you kill someone without a licence, you go to prison - period.

So again... other than a gun for your home or a collector... WTF are you going to do with 50 guns?! The "Stand Your Ground" law is bullshit... in effect, if you look at me funny and I think it was threating - then I should blow your head off?! That is what cRaZy people do... or a "pussy with a gun" does.

Are you going to go up against the govt? The SWAT team, the National Guard, the Army, the Marines, Seal Team 6 are far more trained and far better armed that any CIVILIAN will ever be. They can blow up your home from 100 miles away... by bomb, drone, cruise missle alone.

Seriously, the gun is just a gun... its designed for 2 things. KILL animals (hunting, maybe for food) and to kill another human being. That's it. They are not used to play video games, prop up your sofa because of a missing foot, or improve your HDTV reception.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.