[citation][nom]kashifme21[/nom]Welll i wonder who will be buying hardware from Nvidia and AMD, if there are no games out pushing tech.We can all be happy running GPUs from 3-4yrs back and run any game maxed out lol. RIP Nvidia & AMD.Good job chopping your on feet off supporting those damn consoles.[/citation]
well yes and no. games run good enough at max, but lets go with a 2560x1600 monitor, what will be come a standard affordable resolution within the next 5 years, games have a hard time running on that, almost regardless, especially when you crank the settings up.
even if games dont push tech to the absolute peak as in graphical goodness that was crysis at max, games still push graphics, and those can be improved with better tech.
i, within the last year, upgraded to 5770hd. i know its not the best, but for a single card solution to a non heavy gamer, it was an excellent solution.
[citation][nom]stridergt[/nom]@alidanOh man quit being the consolez spoke person...We all know that no game came close to Crysis graphics for the last FULL 3 YEARS!!!horrific coding my a@@ even Metro 2033 is "heavier" than crysis... and its the only thing coming close.If you are content with yet another consolezzz port, that's your problem, but as everybody stated here it should be the other way around let the kidiez have the medium, dumbed down experience and bring the most technical innovative PC title, which is the greatest Crysis legacy, they sent u to the island bro, not to a rail interactive movie with cutscenes, or low poly, low res monitor experience, no need to get farther away to be haloed in the couch game....PS Technical innovation is not exclusive of great gameplay, AI etc, Quake, Unreal, Halflife, Crysis... is the PC legacy, FPS was is and will be a premium PC experience.[/citation]
you know i have a real hard time not useing language that would get me banned to respond to you. can you not get it through you, i'm guessing, unfused together scull, that a great game doesnt = graphics? that the engine was optimized? that the unnecessary operations were taken out, allowing for the game to look better than the first one, with lesser hardware requirements.
sence you love to hate consoles, let me talk about them. look at them, from the n64 to the ps3. there are stages of graphics.
there is launch graphics,
mid range graphics,
upper teir
and end life cycle.
EVERY game on a console, takes 100% what the console has to offer, unlike a pc, where there are more often than not a bottleneck that prevents 100% use.
games get better looking because the engines evolve, and they learn what can be dont to make the games look better on the same hardware.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED WITH CRYSIS.
CryEngine 1 was farcry
CryEngine 2 was crysis
CryEngine 3 is so optomised that they were capable of putting crysis 2 on a console.
YOU DO REALIZE that unless stated otherwise, all footage so far has been from a console right? they never even shown a pc version but morons like you say they sold out completely, hell i say they are haveing a contest with id right now, with who can make the better engine, crysis on a console? i think i know whos winning.