It's the World’s Largest Projected Capacitive Display

[exfileme]

This LCD display measures 82-inches diagonally and 6-inches deep, and salted as the "world's largest."

It's the World’s Largest Projected Capacitive Display : Read more

 

[Prince_Porter]

I'd love one of these in place of a much needed whiteboard. It would be great for project planning, and it's massive, which just makes it that much cooler.

 

[BruceOTB]

82inch + "Full HD" = LAME

 

[Pyree]

Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge!

 

[zybch]

[citation][nom]Pyree[/nom]Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge![/citation]
I just moved from 24" to 27" screens with the same 1080HD resolution and the increase in pixel pitch was immediately noticeable and now I get distracted by the graininess unless I sit further back (which completely negates the larger display area anyway).
For a massive 82" display designed to be used at touch distance the resolution is just awful.

 

[Blessedman]

I am sure they could have bumped the resolution of the monitor up but not the touch.

 

[doorspawn]

Agree with most of the above - that resolution is pathetic.
Standing that close, letters will probably be larger than 5mm (for capitals) with lots of aliasing.
It might be good for 3D movies in large rooms, but definitely not for standing next to.

 

[Assmar]

[citation][nom]Pyree[/nom]Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge![/citation]
So true, god only knows that my arms length is not the proper viewing distance for a 82" 1080p display.

 

[digiex]

@spammer, your spam would be very visible in LCD display that measures 82-inches diagonally and 6-inches deep, and salted as the "world's largest."

So post it there, not here!

 

[CKKwan]

At this size, even at full HD, a pixel is 0.95mm width, consider very large when you are standing in front.

 

[K-zon]

Well, to say either way for the size in some say "retro-spect" the distances might be farther away. for the resolutions, otherwise, getting something like almost 10k by 10k, would be the idea.

But some thoughts would say probably need a screen in that size even for lower. Suggesting the 1920 x 1080.

 

[will_chellam]

Salted? mmmmmmmmm salty......

 

[christop]

Damn the spam!!!! 3 above me^^^

 

[belardo]

Hey... its the next DELL CELL PHONE!

 

[JohnnyLucky]

Projected Capacitive Display? In plain English does that mean it is a touch screen display?

 

[dread_cthulhu]

Yeah, 1080p is a weak res for something this huge. Should have a much higher option.

 

[jacobdrj]

Yeah, that is not a good resolution in this case. It does give them that title 'World's Biggest', but unfortunately, that may apply to the pixels too...

This should be 2600x1600. At LEAST.

 

[ionut19]

4000x2250. That might work on a 16:9 wide screen this large, but don't know, would that be enough?

 

[jacobdrj]

[citation][nom]ionut19[/nom]4000x2250. That might work on a 16:9 wide screen this large, but don't know, would that be enough?[/citation]
Yes. That would reduce the pixel size by a factor of 4x4.

 

[bv90andy]

[citation][nom]Pyree[/nom]Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge![/citation]

and you have to stay close when working with it. 1mm pixels from 1/2 meter away? The only way I would accept that is for playing original Mario.

This is just wrong.