Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (
More info?)
"Artistry" <fake@fake.com> wrote in message
news:Qwb7e.57540$vL3.28002@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
> Does anyone know why the black Canon Rebel XT is running around $65.00
> more
> than the silver version?
>
> The Canon BG-E3 Vertical Grip/Battery Holder for EOS Digital Rebel XT
> looks
> like it is black. It would visually blend better with the black body.
> But,
> I could put the $65.00 to better use.
>
Black was always the pros choice, and generally costs more in any pro or
semi-pro camera when compared to silver. Back in the good old days the old
Nikons were made of brass and the silver coating was somewhat reflective and
brought more attention to the photographer. The black bodies not only
looked better, but when the black wore off photographers wore their cameras
with the brass showing through like battle ribbons.
Also, as you've noticed, many accessories are black, and match the "pro"
body. I have a motor drive on an old Nikon F, and the camera is silver
while the motor drive is black.
I don't know what's under the silver or black on the Canon . At least on
the Nikon I think the black (plastic) is solid black so it will never wear
off.
Since the black looks more stylish and is considered more "professional
looking," they charge an extra $65 because they can. One nice thing is that
the silver color makes it stand out from all the other SLR's out there.