School Took Thousands of Private Pics of Students

[crazazyasian1337]

[citation][nom]Platypus[/nom]I seriously doubt you have ever been to school.10,000 photos taken of students in their own homes, some of them half-dressed, and an admin that refers to this as her own little soap opera. Do we really need first hand experience at the school to conclude these students have been violated?[/citation]

being a student at this school, i think that this is being being blow way out of proportion. everytime someone posts, the number of pictures taken goes up. in addition, people just keep making things up such as "The parents had talked to the school about not being able to pay the full, and they said it was fine". where the fuck does stuff like that come from?

 

[grieve]

[citation][nom]babybeluga[/nom]Where do I go to buy these pics?[/citation]
oh my god lol... I gave you a negative, but it did make me chuckle. I am assuming you aren't a sick fucker, just odd humor.

 

[grieve]

[citation][nom]Mikeadelic[/nom]I just noticed that the laptops that were issued were Macbooks.That's right.Not a PC. A Mac.[/citation]
A new Apple commercial perhaps?

(PC commercial) Use a PC, protect your freedom!

(Apple Commercial) Ispy with my little eye...

 

[crazazyasian1337]

It's not like apple puts the software on all their computers, only on school or company issued ones if the feature is requested.

 

[keytthom]

wish this happened to my school, i could get my ssd's, and eyefinity setup that i want

 

[gm0n3y]

I'm just wondering how many of photos there are of kids watching porn and jerking it. Statistically, if there were '10000' photos taken, given the average amount of time people spend jerking it infront of the computer, there must be at least a hundred+. Those will be a huge issue if they ever come to light.

 

[cjl]

[citation][nom]back_by_demand[/nom]Who's rules is correct.The use of the punctuation is not truncation, it is plural in the case of possessive, "The rules of who".To remove the punctuation "whos" would be a clumsy attempt at pluralisation and its usage in this sentence would be nonsense.[/citation]
Nope.

"Whose rules" is correct. "Who's rules" is not.

 

[theroguex]

[citation][nom]gnookergi[/nom]Borderline? This IS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.[/citation]

Ah, no. It says that they were partially dressed in some of the pictures. It doesn't say they're having sex with themselves or others in any of the pictures. THAT is child pornography. All we have here is the invasion of the privacy of a minor.

 

[WyomingKnott]

[citation][nom]JonathanDeane[/nom]Its my opinion that when some one pleads the fifth, they are guilty. [/citation]
-1. Make that -40. In theory, use of the right is not prejudicial. In practice, there is so much "perjury trap" fishing done that pleading the Fifth is sometimes the only way to survive.
Yes, guilty people use it. But so do many innocent ones.

 

[dataDINK]

Wow... schools have hit a new found low. We've all known that there are just some teachers that shouldn't be teachers, but this is far worse. This teacher "may have been a voyeur"? I'm pretty sure she was. Destroy her and make things right, get rid of these rights to spy on students and their families.