Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (
More info?)
In article <fafp21pbb16bpldt8iritpu0adbv72kn8f@4ax.com>, Sean says...
>
>On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:57:31 -0600, "Danska" <danska@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sean" <none> wrote in message
>>news:uuee21d2eg11kpdeo24kpp5c88r5t1slti@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:18:12 -0500, Jeff Rife <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Lenroc (lenroc@NOSPAMFORYOU.hotmail.com) wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
>>>>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:05:52 -0500, Kishin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I know that NTSC TVs have 480 lines of resolution, and VHS has only
>>>>> > 240.
>>>>> > But where does Tivo stand on this scale? Is it higher resolution than
>>>>> > VHS? I was just wondering.
>>>>>
>>>>> The resolution is the same as NTSC.
>>>>
>>>>Not as such.
>>>>
>>>>DVD output over S-Video can have 500 TV lines of resolution (which is
>>>>more than any "NTSC-only" TV). This is about the highest quality NTSC
>>>>that a TiVo input would reasonably see (although NTSC can be even better
>>>>at times...just not in most people's homes). This translates to about 650
>>>>pixels across one scan line if you digitize the data (about 720 pixels per
>>>>scan line is the maximum possible for "perfect" NTSC).
>>>>
>>>>At "Best" quality, TiVo uses 480x480 to digitize the data, which is an
>>>>actual loss of resolution before MPEG compression is even applied. I
>>>>have heard that even lower resolutions are used for some of the lower
>>>>quality
>>>>recording options, but I can't confirm this.
>>>
>>>
>>> The picture quality of the Cable DVR's is much better tha Tivo's.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>
>>Hah! I almost fell out of my chair laughing out loud!
>>
>>good one!
>>
>
>Laugh all you want. It's a documented fact.
>
>Sean
the only reason i dont now have my cable company's dvr is my wife hated the user
interface. the SA8300 had hdmi outputs, and oould also record in HD if i wanted.
sadly, i have the new tivo, which does its job quite well, but its no HD dvr.
just my two cents