Xbox Modding Case Dismissed

[tuanmai]

Prosecutors dismiss Xbox360 modding case, “based on fairness and justice.”

Xbox Modding Case Dismissed : Read more

 

[jerreece]

LOL

 

[hellwig]

It's clear what happened hear, the prosecution filed the case in the wrong district. They needed to find a more corporation-friendly judge. I'm guessing they should have tried Minnesota, where apparently offering one song on Napster is a $167,000 penalty.

 

[usfs]

looks like the prosecutor did a 360 and walked away.

 

[nexus9113]

That's why basing your entire case on obviously illegally obtained evidence isn't the best idea. Now if the kid is feeling froggy he can file countersuit for all kinds of fun stuff like defamation, emotional damages, financial damages, and the like.

 

[Guest]

A 360 wouldn't be walking away. That's a 180.

 

[Snipergod87]

[citation][nom]usfs[/nom]looks like the prosecutor did a 360 and walked away.[/citation]

You mean a 180?

 

[dman3k]

LOL! @ [citation][nom]Snipergod87[/nom]You mean a 180?[/citation]

 

[bobusboy]

[citation][nom]dman3k[/nom]LOL! @[/citation]
[citation][nom]Snipergod87[/nom]You mean a 180?[/citation]
[citation][nom]cplcarlman[/nom]A 360 wouldn't be walking away. That's a 180.[/citation]


Its a meme, look it up I'm at work so I can't access encyclopedia dramatica but i'm sure it's on there.

 

[insider3]

I thumbed him up, then felt stupid after realizing a 180 is turning around lol.

 

[vittau]

FOR GREAT JUSTICE!

 

[sagansrun]

YOu can still do a 360 and walk away. YOu just end up walking past the person you're walking away from.

 

[chickenhoagie]

[citation][nom]usfs[/nom]looks like the prosecutor did a 360 and walked away.[/citation]
[citation][nom]Snipergod87[/nom]You mean a 180?[/citation]
no, he actually walked directly into the judge's stand cuz he was a dumbass. so the 360 was plausible

 

[bogcotton]

[citation][nom]cplcarlman[/nom]A 360 wouldn't be walking away. That's a 180.[/citation]

This joke has been done before on toms more than once I think.

 

[g00fysmiley]

counter suit for recording info on his propertywithout his consent, with a suit for defamation of character and recoup of legal expenses imo

 

[socalboomer]

[citation][nom]hellwig[/nom]It's clear what happened hear, the prosecution filed the case in the wrong district. They needed to find a more corporation-friendly judge. I'm guessing they should have tried Minnesota, where apparently offering one song on Napster is a $167,000 penalty.[/citation]
They had to do it in the district where the alleged violation happened.

 

[SteelCity1981]

“I really don’t understand what we’re doing here,” Judge Philip Gutierrez .

Best part of the story.

 

[phraun]

/facepalm at the meme illiteracy

 

[usfs]

[citation][nom]SteelCity1981[/nom]“I really don’t understand what we’re doing here,” Judge Philip Gutierrez .Best part of the story.[/citation]


they were probably like FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU when they heard this.

 

[TheWhiteRose000]

o_0...
Wow so the all in the Family Quote I mentioned before actually worked somewhat...