Heeeer's Johnny's....Microphone

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

wow...a lot of money for a $300 mic.
later,
m
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

That mike was dead. Carson would occasionally hit it with the pencil he
played with. If that mike had been live, you'd know it!

Norm

"Klay Anderson" <klay@klay.com> wrote in message
news:klay-7DCA41.16415021032005@news.xmission.com...
> http://tinyurl.com/4cccv
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Klay Anderson
> http://www.klay.com
> +801-942-8346
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

10K for an SM33 ???

We live in a pretty crazy world don't we...

JP

"Klay Anderson" <klay@klay.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:klay-7DCA41.16415021032005@news.xmission.com...
> http://tinyurl.com/4cccv
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Klay Anderson
> http://www.klay.com
> +801-942-8346
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

The only sensible ones here are the auctioneers, probably on 15% + 10%, from
each premium
It's just another ordinary ugly mic which should have never have been in
shot anyway.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

"Jim Gregory" wrote ...
> The only sensible ones here are the auctioneers, probably
> on 15% + 10%, from each premium
> It's just another ordinary ugly mic which should have never
> have been in shot anyway.

Besides, it was only one in a sequence of mics. He started with
the longer, slimmer, chrome-finish Shure ribbon model, didn't he?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

In article <114054ucmjic558@corp.supernews.com>,
Richard Crowley <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote:
>"Jim Gregory" wrote ...
>> The only sensible ones here are the auctioneers, probably
>> on 15% + 10%, from each premium
>> It's just another ordinary ugly mic which should have never
>> have been in shot anyway.
>
>Besides, it was only one in a sequence of mics. He started with
>the longer, slimmer, chrome-finish Shure ribbon model, didn't he?

I remember him with the SM33. Which, to be honest, is a really nice
ribbon and not just another ordinary ugly mike. I like the SM33 a lot.
Not ten thousand bucks worth, but at least a couple hundred bucks worth.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

On 3/22/05 6:05 AM, in article 4_S%d.3$NQ4.2@newsfe1-win.ntli.net, "Jim
Gregory" <jim.greg@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> The only sensible ones here are the auctioneers, probably on 15% + 10%, from
> each premium
> It's just another ordinary ugly mic which should have never have been in
> shot anyway.
>
>


Wasn;t SOP then to have -the desk mic, -the OH boom and -a lav as options on
on the host?
Not sure about the lav as there WEREN'T invisible lavs then...

The 77 on Letterman's desk (does King still use one in shot?) is never
actually used except for cute Moments to prove it still works I think?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

SSJVCmag <ten@nozirev.gamnocssj.com> wrote:
>
>Wasn;t SOP then to have -the desk mic, -the OH boom and -a lav as options on
>on the host?

At least in the eighties, it was. I recall Penn and Teller splattering
Carson with water and his lav mike cut out. They went to just the SM33
on the desk (and maybe some boom) and the voice quality was very different.
Not bad but much less present.

>The 77 on Letterman's desk (does King still use one in shot?) is never
>actually used except for cute Moments to prove it still works I think?

Dunno, I haven't ever seen Letterman.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

On 3/22/05 7:50 AM, in article 114054ucmjic558@corp.supernews.com, "Richard
Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote:

> "Jim Gregory" wrote ...
>> The only sensible ones here are the auctioneers, probably
>> on 15% + 10%, from each premium
>> It's just another ordinary ugly mic which should have never
>> have been in shot anyway.
>
> Besides, it was only one in a sequence of mics. He started with
> the longer, slimmer, chrome-finish Shure ribbon model, didn't he?

The 300 was a bidierectional
The 33 was a card (and not as nice sounding).
Then they redid the whole audio package (changing from SHURE to AKG) when
the network and the TONIGHT SHOW went stereo.

What did Steve Allen use?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast (More info?)

In
rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.tv.broadcasting,alt.video.equipment.broadcast,
on 22 Mar 2005 09:36:09 -0500, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

>SSJVCmag <ten@nozirev.gamnocssj.com> wrote:

>>The 77 on Letterman's desk (does King still use one in shot?) is never
>>actually used except for cute Moments to prove it still works I think?
>
>Dunno, I haven't ever seen Letterman.

It's just as well, I saw his Late Night show in recent years after
a about a decade of no TV, he's aging badly.

>--scott

-----
http://mindspring.com/~benbradley