OK Will, I have a weblog

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JL

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
59
0
18,580
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"nmm" <voxman@arvotek.net> wrote in message
news:1105652178.676431.136730@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Iraq had a Democracy before the invasion. Saddam won the last election
> with an overwhelming majority.

hahahahaha!!!!

I actually think, nmm, that you are just someone baiting guys like me in the
newsgroup. And I fell for it.

But no more. I will just cheer your jokes from now on. They are way
funny...!

JL
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Roger W. Norman wrote:
> You might as well stop now, Will. As you've done in the past, you
presume
> to present what I've said in the light you wish to view it.
>
> Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now
get
> yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to
continue
> YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.
>
> I've been nice to you so far. Do you dare to show your cyberface
around my
> back yard? Even after you've demanded that I create that back yard?
>
> Pussy.

> Roger W. Norman
> SirMusic Studio

Actually I'm winding all this down, in fact I have responded to the
comments of several individuals on this and other threads privately.

And I "demanded" you create a weblog because I understand you well
enough to know that's what you really wanted Roger, you needed to do
that... Hey, who's looking out for you? <g>

But I do think you should at least attempt to do better than making
with the Bush hating, because the politics of hate are as much the
stuff of demogogues in America as in the Middle East.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Staff Audio / Fox News Channel / M-AES
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

You might as well stop now, Will. As you've done in the past, you presume
to present what I've said in the light you wish to view it.

Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now get
yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to continue
YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.

I've been nice to you so far. Do you dare to show your cyberface around my
back yard? Even after you've demanded that I create that back yard?

Pussy.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"WillStG" <willstg@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1105614214.128761.300890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> reddred wrote:
> > The idea that anyone thought that the Iraqi's were 'incapable' of
> having a
> > government modelled on ours (which is what you mean.
>
> No, what Roger and DeserTBob and other have said is that Iraqi's
> and other people in the Middle East are only capable of living under
> the rule of strongmen, because they have no history of self governance.
>
>
> > You don't mean
> > 'self-rule', because all that means is a nation stste not being ruled
> by
> > another - right now, they are ruled by a another, the USA) is purely
> a
> > conservative (read: Rove) invention, meant to malign Democratic
> concerns
> > about the elections viability and the long term stability of Iraq.
> Sure the
> > Iraqi's are capable, if they aren't too busy killing each other. But
> the
> > Shia majority will most likely opt for a theocracy modeled after
> Iran. It's
> > not a question of capability, it's a question of desire.
>
> They are having an election of Iraqis by Iraqis to write an Iraqi
> Constitution, and the only thing we have insisted on is that they
> consider the rights of women to Vote and protection for Minority ethnic
> and religious groups. You call that "America ruling Iraq"? That claim
> it only your "beard" for holding a decidedly Anti-Democratic position
> when it comes to Iraqi/Islamic/Middle Eastern people.
>
> > Again, the idea that anyone believes the Iraqi's are 'incapable' is a
> myth
> > stemming from a single remark GW made almost a year ago. Making that
> remark
> > also gave him an out in case the US sponsored elections simply don't
> work -
> > blame it on the Iraqi's. Rove and Bush are the ones that
> intentionally
> > called the Iraqi's 'ability to have a democracy' into question. It
> wasn't
> > even part of the dialog until they started in on it.
>
> No, this has to do with a recent remark from DeserTBob about
> Iraqi's, long winding threads from Roger about Iraq's cultural history,
> and the cutural condescention and latent ethnocentric bigotry upon
> which you also clearly base your political views.
>
> But perhaps I am being a bit harsh, as I doubt you have actually
> personally thought this out at all yourself. You are most likely merely
> following the Bush hating pack, which is slipping deeper and deeper
> into darkness...
>
> Beware of darkness Red.
>
> Will Miho
> NY Music & TV Audio Guy
> Staff Audio / Fox News Channel / M-AES
> "The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On 14 Jan 2005 17:47:53 -0800, "WillStG" <willstg@aol.com> wrote:

>Actually I'm winding all this down

When?

Al
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Roger W. Norman wrote:

> I said a year before the war that A) we were going to war on Iraq, and B)
> they had no weapons of mass destruction. I'm a nobody and I KNEW this.

Something even more troubling that you, I and others
predicted because it was obvious. The "administration" has
effectively created a training program for terror:


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/14/politics/14intel.html?oref=login&th

(Sorry about the need to register for the NYT online but
it's worth it.)


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

play on wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2005 17:47:53 -0800, "WillStG" <willstg@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >Actually I'm winding all this down
>
> When?
>
> Al

Well I suppose if I have to wait until you have a clue Al, that
would take about forever.

Will
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

JL wrote:
> "nmm" <voxman@arvotek.net> wrote in message
> news:1105652178.676431.136730@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Iraq had a Democracy before the invasion. Saddam won the last
election
> > with an overwhelming majority.
>
> hahahahaha!!!!
>
> I actually think, nmm, that you are just someone baiting guys like me
in the
> newsgroup. And I fell for it.
>
> But no more. I will just cheer your jokes from now on. They are way
> funny...!
>
> JL

Oh wait, this is Will Miho's Columbian speaking.

fact is gallup did a pole that is now being supressed that found 52%
of Iraqis wanted President Saddam back.

Al jazeera did a pole that showed 60% of Iraqis wanted Saddam back.

the majority of the people in Iraq would rather have the old days
back.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:09:51 -0800, Bob Cain
<arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote:

>
>
>Roger W. Norman wrote:
>
>> I said a year before the war that A) we were going to war on Iraq, and B)
>> they had no weapons of mass destruction. I'm a nobody and I KNEW this.
>
>Something even more troubling that you, I and others
>predicted because it was obvious. The "administration" has
>effectively created a training program for terror:
>
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/14/politics/14intel.html?oref=login&th
>
>(Sorry about the need to register for the NYT online but
>it's worth it.)

They are also creating a gulag to keep terror suspects imprisoned
indefinitely without trial or any due process:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1390096,00.html

Al
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Roger W. Norman wrote:

> Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now get
> yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to continue
> YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.

Good on ya, Roger; if there is real interest in discussion then surely
he will take it there.

--
ha
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Alas, I've only posted one article and no one has bothered answering or
commenting, so maybe I just wasted $40 for a years worth of blog service,
but the point is that he's still here arguing and I'm not. I think that
does say it all. Then again, it's not all that much fun to go into a battle
of wits with an unarmed opponent! <g>

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"hank alrich" <walkinay@thegrid.net> wrote in message
news:1gqfk5k.1rvyc2ef0rl7tN%walkinay@thegrid.net...
> Roger W. Norman wrote:
>
> > Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now get
> > yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to
continue
> > YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.
>
> Good on ya, Roger; if there is real interest in discussion then surely
> he will take it there.
>
> --
> ha
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:06:39 -0500, "Roger W. Norman"
<rnorman@starpower.net> wrote:

>Then again, it's not all that much fun to go into a battle
>of wits with an unarmed opponent!

I thought that was happening *before* you got the blog..!

Al
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Depends on whether you view me as the one being unarmed. I'm sure it's
debateable, but I don't see Wm. F. Buckley there, nor even WILL.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"play_on" <playon@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ut50v094vqfrnj61hkfh3bgspi8eki4bbf@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:06:39 -0500, "Roger W. Norman"
> <rnorman@starpower.net> wrote:
>
> >Then again, it's not all that much fun to go into a battle
> >of wits with an unarmed opponent!
>
> I thought that was happening *before* you got the blog..!
>
> Al
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

> Alas, I've only posted one article and no one has bothered answering or
> commenting


I did. I forgot to bookmark it though.

KF'ing Will has been the best thing I've done since Al Gore invented the internet.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

> Depends on whether you view me as the one being unarmed. I'm sure it's
> debateable, but I don't see Wm. F. Buckley there, nor even WILL.

As least Buckley has a brain.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

I noticed, Don, but I haven't figured this whole weblog thing out yet, so if
I don't answer yet, just put it up to my father-in-law passing away and not
having a lot of time as my wife is the executor of the estate and we just
buried him on this Tuesday past.

I have, however, put up a couple of more articles you are welcome to look
at. Perhaps it's best to do the email thing if you want to communicate, or
at least until I have a grasp of what this weblog thing is all about.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Don Cooper" <dcooper28800@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:41F29564.C1EA55C3@comcast.net...
>
>
> "Roger W. Norman" wrote:
>
> > Alas, I've only posted one article and no one has bothered answering or
> > commenting
>
>
> I did. I forgot to bookmark it though.
>
> KF'ing Will has been the best thing I've done since Al Gore invented the
internet.