Uh oh: Verizon Dropping Unlimited Data Plans Too?

Status
Not open for further replies.

sliem

Distinguished
Dec 14, 2009
942
0
18,930
Either the internet is not ready for "unlimited 4G" or these companies (read: owners) need money to buy new car, helicopter, personal jet and islands.
 

selits

Distinguished
Mar 29, 2009
8
0
18,510
I don't mind them making different plans for rates/data for smartphones as long as its not they same as ATT... if Verizon had a plan where I paid $15 or less for 2 or 3GB, I would probably change my unlimited to it but they will probably be greedy...
 

borisof007

Distinguished
Mar 16, 2010
186
0
18,630
Normally I've been all gun ho in the opposition of these moves... until I recently took a look at my average monthly data usage.

Turns out that on my Droid I only used a maximum of 200 mb of data a month, and I average about 150. If they run the route of AT&T, I could potentially save $15 bucks a month x2 because my gf and I both have Droid phones. Free $30 bucks off a month? I'll take that.
 

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
817
0
18,930
Verizon and AT&T will have no problem with network congestion when people leave their networks for Sprint and T-Mobile (neither of whom could afford to follow suit, their unlimited plans are their saving grace).

My father-in-law just bought an LG android device. The clerks at the store actually sold him on a 25MB data plan. I learned this after I downloaded a 5MB update to the Google Maps app over his 3G connection for him. Needless to say, he will be upgrading to a more capable package to avoid the inevitable overage charges. I guess Verizon is trying to cheat its customers just like every other company.

I really don't understand pay-per-download, as even per-hour dial-up billing back in the day made more sense. Seriously, who plans to browse the internet for 32MB of data? But I'm sure some people plan to browse for an hour before stopping, so even time-based billing makes more sense than data (not that I like either idea).
 

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
817
0
18,930
[citation][nom]borisof007[/nom]Normally I've been all gun ho in the opposition of these moves... until I recently took a look at my average monthly data usage.Turns out that on my Droid I only used a maximum of 200 mb of data a month, and I average about 150. If they run the route of AT&T, I could potentially save $15 bucks a month x2 because my gf and I both have Droid phones. Free $30 bucks off a month? I'll take that.[/citation]

You sir, are an idiot. You ever hear the old poem about how first they came for the jews, but I wasn't a jew so I didnt' speak up. Then they came for the gypsies, but I wasn't a gypsie so I didn't speak up. Finally they came for me, and no one was left to speak up?

What if Verizon was planning on having only a 25MB and 100MB data plan? You wouldn't save $15, you'd pay an extra $35 when you had to buy a second 100MB chunk. Seriously, is anyone capable of thinking farther than 5-seconds ahead. Next month, this guy will use 201MB and bitch that Verizon charged him extra.
 
I've had verizon wireless for about 5 years now and to date I have had little to complain about. Currently I am on the unlimited data plan for about $15/mo extra, however, as the other poster stated I doubt i use an excessive amount of bandwidth. The reason I like having the unlimited option is so I do not have to worry about going over some limit and getting raped for each kb/mb afterwards. Verizon, if you try to treat us like at&t I might have to rethink my options
 

airborne11b

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2008
78
0
18,590
I have sprint with the new EVO 4G, and between youtube, Sprint TV, downloading apps, facebook, emails, ect ect, I burn many many gigs a month in data. I also use PDA NET to connect my laptop to the internet like an air-card. Not only is it free, but man on 4G it's amazingly fast.

I don't see why everyone who has 4G in their area hasn't switched to sprint. Unlimited mobile to mobile talking from sprint works for both incoming, and out going calls, to any carrier. Only time you use minutes is when you call a lan line (for me, and most people, that's just about never) and with unlimited data I pay about 70 bucks a month, and thats basically for unlimited talk, text, and data on 4G. Verizon sucks in comparison, and now they going to cut off their unlimited data? lololol.
 

gorehound

Distinguished
Jan 16, 2009
276
0
18,930
more garbage as usual for folks who use smart-phones.
dump verizon and att and write a not to another company stating if they would give you unlimited rates you would use them forever.maybe that will help maybe not
 

joebob2000

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2006
525
0
18,930
[citation][nom]selits[/nom]I don't mind them making different plans for rates/data for smartphones as long as its not they same as ATT... if Verizon had a plan where I paid $15 or less for 2 or 3GB, I would probably change my unlimited to it but they will probably be greedy...[/citation]

LOL, 15 bucks, that would be a dream. 2GB is more than probably 99% of their customers use. I tried to see how much crap I could download in a month and barely got to 1GB before giving up. There's just not that much you can do with a phone (at least for now). Here's hoping the sub-$30 plans are at least 2GB, but I wouldn't be surprised if I ended up still paying just as much in the future. I think a sweet-spot tier to keep everyone happy would be 1GB for $15, 3GB for $30 and 5GB for $45. I would bet money that the lowest tier is $20 or $25 for 1 or 2 GB though, that's just how Verizon rolls.
 

decepticon

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2008
66
0
18,580
I don't understand why these companies keep advertising "fastest xG" network if they are going to limit you on how much you can download. With web browsing and video viewing on the go, your limit will be reached faster with the faster network speeds. It's like saying hurry up and wait at the same time.
 

tokenz

Distinguished
Mar 11, 2006
206
0
18,830
I dont care I will pay full price for the phone, and keep my grandfathered plan. Can't really switch here as Sprint sucks for reception here. F-U Verizon
 

seboj

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2008
79
0
18,580
[citation][nom]borisof007[/nom]Normally I've been all gun ho in the opposition of these moves... until I recently took a look at my average monthly data usage.Turns out that on my Droid I only used a maximum of 200 mb of data a month, and I average about 150. If they run the route of AT&T, I could potentially save $15 bucks a month x2 because my gf and I both have Droid phones. Free $30 bucks off a month? I'll take that.[/citation]


Think about it. Not too long ago, there was no data on your phone. Then you got an app or web browser to use a little data here and there. More data apps appear, and your data usage goes up. Then mobile data exploded, and you got a phone that's "data heavy" and you're now averaging 150mb a month.

You don't think that pretty soon, with this "mobile explosion", you're data use isn't going to continue to skyrocket just as it has been in the past?

You people are too short-sighted. You think your current trends are going to continue 6 months, 1 year, 2 years down the road? Pretty soon you'll all be begging for your unlimited data back. But by the time your phone companies bring unlimited data plans back, it will be $60, $80, $100 a month.

Look beyond your nose once in a while. I need a nap. /grumpiness
 

MxM

Distinguished
May 23, 2005
110
0
18,630
[citation][nom]hellwig[/nom]You sir, are an idiot. You ever hear the old poem about how first they came for the jews, but I wasn't a jew so I didnt' speak up. Then they came for the gypsies, but I wasn't a gypsie so I didn't speak up. Finally they came for me, and no one was left to speak up?What if Verizon was planning on having only a 25MB and 100MB data plan? You wouldn't save $15, you'd pay an extra $35 when you had to buy a second 100MB chunk. Seriously, is anyone capable of thinking farther than 5-seconds ahead. Next month, this guy will use 201MB and bitch that Verizon charged him extra.[/citation]
This is "slippery slope argument" - the worst kind of argument there is, IMO.
There are reasons to criticize this decision, the main is probably slowing down the rate of developing the use of internet on the phones, another is inconvenience to the costumers (monitoring their data volume) but your argument is not a very good one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.