No, what I'm telling you is that that is a matter of semantics. You are purchasing an item, not a "license." We clearly see things differently if you don't believe in resale. But you know what? The ECJ agrees with me . . . and you're just some random person on the Internet. In addition to that, how many other industries can you name that explicitly deny resale?
If Ford, or any other major automotive manufacturer suddenly announced tomorrow that nobody is allowed to sell cars that they purchased from Ford, because you're "only buying the license to USE the car," you can bet there would be a shitstorm of epic proportions.
Your argument is extremely flawed. I did not say that I could claim others' property. Nice straw man, though.
Mine, on the other hand, is supported by a high court- you know, those things that specialize in interpreting law and protecting peoples' rights?